Is it okay to add the incest_(lore) tags retroactively once a character’s identity was revealed?

Turns out this character in a bear costume is momo’s sister, sakura_(dagasi).
post #4276564
This would make every post with this bear costume and momo incest, but we can’t see sakura, she’s hidden by the costume.

Can it still be tagged incest_(lore)?

it would be fine to tag stuff like this retroactively, normally. but also, for this case specifically...

I'm not so sure it has _always_ been Sakura in the costume. there are several points where this teddy bear costume has been seen with the zipper fully open and the character inside was male, also, nearly every time we see any bit of the character's fur it's a bit darker and a bit less pink than what Momo and Sakura have.

this is furry world, so all of that could be explained away with her using different TF methods and, like, MegaMan Legends-style karma-based fur coloring or something. but, without hard confirmation of the retcon from the artist, I would just leave it.

If the post was made before it was revealed, then no since the artist most likely didn’t intend it to be.

post #4907034

Usually, yes, but in this specific instance... I would say no.
With the new posts, the implication is there, but at no point in that series of images is it made clear if it's Sakura or another character wearing the costume. There's no identifying traits of the exposed parts of the costumer.
TWYS applying, we can't see Sakura, so we can't tag Sakura, and if we can't tag for Sakura, we can't tag for incest.