The bulk update request #8996 is pending approval.

create alias belly_folds (382) -> belly_rolls (1726)
create alias flabby_arms (709) -> arm_rolls (242)
create alias flabby_legs (111) -> leg_rolls (257)
create implication love_handles (4192) -> belly_rolls (1726)
create implication belly_rolls (1726) -> fat_rolls (2199)
create implication back_rolls (709) -> fat_rolls (2199)
create implication neck_rolls (233) -> fat_rolls (2199)
create implication arm_rolls (242) -> fat_rolls (2199)
create implication leg_rolls (257) -> fat_rolls (2199)
create implication neck_rolls (233) -> double_chin (1866)
create implication arm_rolls (242) -> fat_arms (813)
create implication leg_rolls (257) -> fat_legs (329)
create implication blobby (315) -> morbidly_obese (10855)
create implication belly_focus (798) -> belly (251954)
create implication belly_grab (2853) -> belly (251954)
create implication belly_rolls (1726) -> belly (251954)

Reason: Trying to improve and simplify the variety of descriptive tags for fat characters. The flabby_* tags are aliased to *_rolls so to fall in line with the other fat_roll tags. All varieties of fat_roll tags imply fat_rolls. Cleaning up some other implications.

"Blobby" seems to be a workaround for hyper_fat being aliased away. Beyond that I have no concerns.

When I think of love handles in the fat sense, I imagine something more along the lines of slightly_chubby than morbidly_obese. Can't "love handles" also be used for well-defined oblique muscles?

arrow189 said:
When I think of love handles in the fat sense, I imagine something more along the lines of slightly_chubby than morbidly_obese. Can't "love handles" also be used for well-defined oblique muscles?

This isn't implicating it to morbidly_obese?

arrow189 said:
When I think of love handles in the fat sense, I imagine something more along the lines of slightly_chubby than morbidly_obese. Can't "love handles" also be used for well-defined oblique muscles?

If you look up "love handles" on google, every result is about getting rid of fat. Also, the belly_rolls tag doesn't necessarily mean the character is really fat. A slightly chubby character can easily have belly rolls or love handles.

regsmutt said:
"Blobby" seems to be a workaround for hyper_fat being aliased away. Beyond that I have no concerns.

I was not aware of the aliased hyper_fat tag, but the fact that there is no distinction between essentially a living pile of fat and a extremely fat figure that is still recognizable as a body is kind of ridiculous.

nameandaddress said:
I was not aware of the aliased hyper_fat tag, but the fact that there is no distinction between essentially a living pile of fat and a extremely fat figure that is still recognizable as a body is kind of ridiculous.

Yeah, it's not the best. The name using a medical term isn't the best either. There's been discussion about this and it really should be resolved.