One thing that has caught my attention of this page, is its policy of quality standards, I have seen drawings that have a great lack of detail, which are approved anyway, an example is that of an artist who has many negative votes.

Votes are a terrible indicator of artistic quality.

Votes mean nothing in this, and if they were approved, they probably did exceed the minimum quality requirements. Also amount of detail is one of the smallest aspects you need to think about in this matter. Art can be extremely simplified, and still good. It's the overall artistic skills that matters more.

Normally I would say yes, but, I have my doubts about that, so I don't have much confidence in the site.

rupikonna said:
Votes mean nothing in this, and if they were approved, they probably did exceed the minimum quality requirements. Also amount of detail is one of the smallest aspects you need to think about in this matter. Art can be extremely simplified, and still good. It's the overall artistic skills that matters more.

Normally I would say yes, but, I have my doubts about that, so I don't have much confidence in the site.

You can blacklist score:<10 or something if you don't like low scoring posts.

anomius027 said:
Normally I would say yes, but, I have my doubts about that, so I don't have much confidence in the site.

Huh?

I like how they waited a whole year after their artworks got deleted before complaining about the quality standards.
This is not your personal art gallery, and you are free to take your artwork elsewhere if you do not like the standards or how votes are given.

anomius027 said:
I have seen drawings that have a great lack of detail, which are approved anyway, an example is that of an artist who has many negative votes.

If you can point out the exact post that you feel does not meet the quality standards, we might even give it a second review.

thegreatwolfgang said:
I like how they waited a whole year after their artworks got deleted before complaining about the quality standards.
This is not your personal art gallery, and you are free to take your artwork elsewhere if you do not like the standards or how votes are given.

If you can point out the exact post that you feel does not meet the quality standards, we might even give it a second review.

Well, I could tell you privately.

rupikonna said:
Huh?

It doesn't give me much confidence from what I've seen.

thegreatwolfgang said:
I like how they waited a whole year after their artworks got deleted before complaining about the quality standards.
This is not your personal art gallery, and you are free to take your artwork elsewhere if you do not like the standards or how votes are given.

They’ve been complaining about the quality standards off and on for the last year across tickets, DMs, comments, etc. - this is just the first time they’ve done it in the forums. It’s getting a little annoying.

I have simply given my opinion on something.

I don't know where you see the complaint.

Trust me, I understand the frustration with the quality standards. They're extremely arbitrary, the argument for KEEPING them arbitrary is a rather weak one, and yet they're also inconsistent judging by how even images saturated with compression artifacts still somehow gets through the cracks with alarming frequency.

BUT. Given what it looks like here, you're not talking about the legitimate issues with the quality standards system, are you?

lendrimujina said:
Trust me, I understand the frustration with the quality standards. They're extremely arbitrary, the argument for KEEPING them arbitrary is a rather weak one, and yet they're also inconsistent judging by how even images saturated with compression artifacts still somehow gets through the cracks with alarming frequency.

Let's say that partial arbitration is somewhat debatable.

Let's not "let's say" the topic. Actually SAY what you mean instead of vague references to being unhappy about something.