Yeah there was a image on this site people bitch about, and it started wave 2 of the neo lobsterban. I used to be able to find it with the tag lobsterban but someone removed the tag.....

So I cant find the image now. I wont go into detail of what the image was..however if you know what lobsterban is and the newer image that has it...then I think you already know what image I speak of.

Anyone have the link?

Have you tried lol_comments?

https://e621.net/post/show/333361

Varka deleted it, though.

Rocket_Corgi said:
https://e621.net/post/show/333361

Varka deleted it, though.

:(

And to think that Varka, of all people would delete it for being 'not_furry'.

Renard_Queenston said:
And to think that Varka, of all people would delete it for being 'not_furry'.

You'd be surprised that a lot of mods delete for that reason.

Since Varka deleted that 'lobsterban' cub porn, shouldn't he get banned?

O wait, the admins slash mods don't have to follow their rules >:) /dictatorship

Not_furry, poor quality and irrelevant to site are all invalid ffd reasons.

Well poor quality as in the artistic quality, maybe it was pixely or something.

I chuckled.

They're invalid flag reasons because the admins make the subjective decisions about what is and is not relevant, not us, and do not need the userbases' opinion on it. FFD is essentially only for letting them know when DNP or reposted material is put up, and that's basically it.

Rocket_Corgi said:and do not need the userbases' opinion on.it.

That's some excellent communication going on there Mods :/

Rocket_Corgi said:
FFD is essentially only for letting them know when DNP or reposted material is put up, and that's basically it.

ummm
- Duplicate of #postnumber
- Inferior (i.e. smaller, sketch, cropped, or resized) version of #postnumber; lame-mans dupe
- Updated version has been posted (usually applies to a flash); meaning same picture BUT added something
- Drawn by an artist or owned by a site on the DNP list
- Violates the site's posting rules[/b]
Real pornography: Any photograph or movie that depicts real people engaging in sexual acts or appearing partially or wholly nude. See InsaneKangaroo
Watermarked: Any image where a person who is not the original copyright owner has placed a watermark on the image. DEVIANTART IS ALLOWED SUPPOSIDLY. THIS GIANT WATERMARK IS IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS IMAGE AND IS MAKING IT HARD TO FAP. /rage

Poorly compressed: Any image where compression artifacts are easily visible.

Mario583 said:

Okay, so I missed a few. I was paraphrasing. We get it, you hate the administration. No one cares.

inb4 LOL U CAERD ENUF TO RESPOND

Rocket_Corgi said:
We get it, you hate the administration. No one cares.

When did I ever say this?

It flavors everything you say on this site and makes it taste like assmad. :I

Mario583 said:
You'd be surprised that a lot of mods delete for that reason.

Since Varka deleted that 'lobsterban' cub porn, shouldn't he get banned?

O wait, the admins slash mods don't have to follow their rules >:) /dictatorship

WTF, They banned like 10 users for flagging it for deletion, then out of nowhere a admin deletes it for not_furry? even though it HAD a MLP Pony in the image? wtf? ...that image should have stayed, if not then what was the bloody point of the lobsterban if they just trash the image anyway? Was this over looked or something?

Conker said:
WTF, They banned like 15 users for flagging it for deltion, then out of nowhere a admin deletes it? wtf? ...that image should have stayed

They were banned for bad flagging reasons.
You aren't supposed to flag for anything but a handful of specific reasons.
Images can be deleted for other reasons, but since they are subjective reasons that is up to the admins, and should not be flagged for.

Hammie said:
They were banned for bad flagging reasons.
You aren't supposed to flag for anything but a handful of specific reasons.
Images can be deleted for other reasons, but since they are subjective reasons that is up to the admins, and should not be flagged for.

Yeah they got banned for flagging it for "not_furry" "poor quality" and "not relevant to the site." which are the same reasons it was deleted for. If none of them are valid reasons then the image should have stayed, also how is it not furry when it had a pony in the image?

Conker said:
Yeah they got banned for flagging it for "not_furry" "poor quality" and "not relevant to the site." which are the same reasons it was deleted for. If none of them are valid reasons then the image should have stayed, also how is it not furry when it had a pony in the image?

Possible deletion reasons are different than valid flag reasons. Hammie already said it, and I don't know why you find it difficult to comprehend.

Also shirt with furry character doesn't make picture furry.

But still, I'm sad it was deleted. It was beautiful! :(

Conker said:
Yeah they got banned for flagging it for "not_furry" "poor quality" and "not relevant to the site." which are the same reasons it was deleted for. If none of them are valid reasons then the image should have stayed, also how is it not furry when it had a pony in the image?

Those aren't valid reasons to flag but they are valid reasons to delete and since only admins can delete, it's up to them to decide.

It was that image with a long flag ''histoty''? (yeah, I typed that wrong on purpose, as I did accidentally when making the original comment)

Edit: May I ask why do you need it?

We really were only keeping it around for a while to get the point across that you can't flag it for subjective reasons. The reason admins can delete for relevance is that we have a more or less defined characteristic of what we want and don't want. Letting 100,000 users decide would not have any coherency

That image was in very poor taste and just crappy overall, so it's not like any of us disagreed with it's deletion

Hammie said:
They were banned for bad flagging reasons.
You aren't supposed to flag for anything but a handful of specific reasons.

https://e621.net/forum/show/23632

I think dropdown menu was a great idea. Something like that: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1099302/ffd.png

Rainbow_Dash said:
We really were only keeping it around for a while to get the point across that you can't flag it for subjective reasons. The reason admins can delete for relevance is that we have a more or less defined characteristic of what we want and don't want. Letting 100,000 users decide would not have any coherency

That image was in very poor taste and just crappy overall, so it's not like any of us disagreed with it's deletion

It just seemed odd people got temp bans over the image wanting it removed, then its removed for those very reasons. When people see the reason it was deleted, they will think its a good flag reason. I just think the reason for deletion was bad, and trashing it after the lesson was in bad tastes. Thats all really

Conker said:
It just seemed odd people got temp bans over the image wanting it removed, then its removed for those very reasons. When people see the reason it was deleted, they will think its a good flag reason. I just think the reason for deletion was bad, and trashing it after the lesson was in bad tastes. Thats all really

Flags are for helping mods to find issues that they could have overlooked (DNP, reposts) not to express your opinion about pictures.

The fate of such people is as almost as "odd", as fate of people who think that if admins can give warnings for people that means that they also can. It's called backseat moderating, and FFD abuse is very similar to this.