I just wanted to know why a 'smaller/resized text edited random porn image' has been stitched together posted on this site....even though the original art has been uploaded on this site.

In short: Why is this https://e621.net/post/show/344093 still here when the images are on the site unedited?

Sorry to ask here but I wasn't sure who to ask about this :V

Just worried if this stuff stays more badly text added images will appear on the site.

Like I said on the image, it's gonna stay on e6....FOREVER

TheHuskyK9 said:
Like I said on the image, it's gonna stay on e6....FOREVER

...that has nothing to do with the subject though :v

Conker said:
...that has nothing to do with the subject though :v

It's not a dupe, it isn't an inferior vesion of another image, and there's no reason to delete it.......FOREVER

TheHuskyK9 said:
It's not a dupe, it isn't an inferior vesion of another image, and there's no reason to delete it.......FOREVER

Its a inferior edited dup, all 3 images its made out of are on the site. That image has been stretched to be bigger and have black boxs and text pasted over it to try to make it into porn from mspaint. So yes, its inferior to the ones already on the site.

Conker said:
Its a inferior edited dup, all 3 images its made out of are on the site. That image has been stretched to be bigger and have black boxs and text pasted over it to try to make it into porn from mspaint. So yes, its inferior to the ones already on the site.

It is a suggestive comic made out of innocent pictures.
Why shouldn't it stay?

NotMeNotYou said:
It is a suggestive comic made out of innocent pictures.
Why shouldn't it stay?

Due to it being an inferior quality image of existing posts? Also it would promote more fored meme text edits of existing images. Is that a good enough reason?

I just mention it as I saw a lot of "prepare your anus" edits from a few images already on the site that where deleted for inferior quality, just not sure why this one remained up.

Conker said:
Due to it being an inferior quality image of existing posts? Also it would promote more fored meme text edits of existing images. Is that a good enough reason?

I just mention it as I saw a lot of "prepare your anus" edits from a few images already on the site that where deleted for inferior quality, just not sure why this one remained up.

But those edits change it from 3 random pictures to a short comic, sure the quality could have been better, but why should this rather minor flaw stop us from keeping it?
And that comic isn't promoting meme text edits anymore than a dictionary of the english language promotes to write books.

NotMeNotYou said:
But those edits change it from 3 random pictures to a short comic, sure the quality could have been better, but why should this rather minor flaw stop us from keeping it?
And that comic isn't promoting meme text edits anymore than a dictionary of the english language promotes to write books.

How it is a comic? All it is, would be a image with some random text added about rape. It just seems like a waste of space since its inferior to whats on here already.

Also it does kinda promote that, if someone comes to this site and thats one of the images they see approved then it would give them the idea any image with text edited onto it would be allowed given if its already on the site or quality.

Just some food for thought I guess. I guess this topic could be for questioning why some worse quality edit dups are still allowed.

Conker said:
How it is a comic? All it is, would be a image with some random text added about rape. It just seems like a waste of space since its inferior to whats on here already.

So are adventures of ashchu. They are on site, and get comic tag.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
So are adventures of ashchu. They are on site, and get comic tag.

If you are going to make a reference to something, do you mind linking to it? (no idea what you are talking about)

Conker said:
If you are going to make a reference to something, do you mind linking to it? (no idea what you are talking about)

May god have mercy of your eyes: https://e621.net/pool?query=ashchu&commit=Search

Butterscotch said:
May god have mercy of your eyes: https://e621.net/pool?query=ashchu&commit=Search

wait...thats it? ....I didnt know that was an edit....I thought it was just well drawn poke porn with bad porn dialog XD

Conker said:
If you are going to make a reference to something, do you mind linking to it? (no idea what you are talking about)

Butterscotch gave the link. I didn't say it was an edit. All of these are also badly drawn pictures with some random text added. If we keep them, why shouldn't we keep this post. I would rather see this post than ashchu.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Butterscotch gave the link.

That was after I asked

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
I didn't say it was an edit. All of these are also badly drawn pictures with some random text added. If we keep them, why shouldn't we keep this post. I would rather see this post than ashchu.

Eh that link had well drawn comics...unless it was edits of the show. Also quality wise ashchu is better..

Conker said:
If you are going to make a reference to something, do you mind linking to it? (no idea what you are talking about)

https://e621.net/comment/show/345324

lol, you've only commented on it with the catchphrase.

corgi_bread said:
https://e621.net/comment/show/345324

lol, you've only commented on it with the catchphrase.

never knew the name of it till now XD

NotMeNotYou said:
But those edits change it from 3 random pictures to a short comic, sure the quality could have been better, but why should this rather minor flaw stop us from keeping it?
And that comic isn't promoting meme text edits anymore than a dictionary of the english language promotes to write books.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
So are adventures of ashchu. They are on site, and get comic tag.

The two people in the thread that actually MAKE sense. So you argue with them.... It may not be the best picture but its better than some stuff on the site DISTURBING WARNING! post#358447

Killingsworth said:
post #358447

You gotta space out the post from the number symbol for it to work, also, just thumb it bro...

Killingsworth said:
. It may not be the best picture but its better than some stuff on the site DISTURBING WARNING! post#358447

What you find 'disturbing' has nothing to do with quality of inferior already existing edit posts

Conker said:
Its a inferior edited dup, all 3 images its made out of are on the site. That image has been stretched to be bigger and have black boxs and text pasted over it to try to make it into porn from mspaint. So yes, its inferior to the ones already on the site.

It can't be a duplicate of three different images at the same time. That's not how duplicates work.

Snowy said:
It can't be a duplicate of three different images at the same time. That's not how duplicates work.

The 3 images are on this site, the user took the 3 images and put them together and stretched them with MSpaint to be bigger edited text and a fake censor box to try to say its porn.

So yes all 3 images already exist on the site so it is a bad inferior quality dup edit.