Topic: Tag Implications: mega_(pokemon) -> mega_evolution

Posted under General

Implication mega_mewtwo -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_lucario -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_absol -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_mawile -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_ampharos -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_blaziken -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_charizard -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_venusaur -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_blastoise -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_garchomp -> mega_evolution
Implication mega_kangaskhan -> mega_evolution

Reason: Since there is a mega_evolution tag and a tag for each mega evolution already known I guess there should be an tag implication on these cases, otherwise there would be no need to have mega_evolution tag at all

Updated by Halite

Yep, just didn't feel like making the thread myself.
This definitely should happen.

As an aside, another set I'm too lazy to make is all the legendaries to legendary_pokemon.
If you're feeling particularly helpful.

Updated by anonymous

I would even add implications from all pokemon tags to pokemon if I knew how to do it myself.

It would be nearly impossible to do so by hand, but I could write a script to do that automatically.

Updated by anonymous

beastarman said:
I would even add implications from all pokemon tags to pokemon if I knew how to do it myself.

It would be nearly impossible to do so by hand, but I could write a script to do that automatically.

Doing what you just did here is best for large quantities of tags, just make a thread, and post them.

Actual suggestions are best kept to situations where you're only submitting a couple at a time.
Too many can slow things down for the admins processing them.

Updated by anonymous

Do we really need all these? If we do one of you better help out and start creating these implications

Updated by anonymous

There is now Mega Charizard X... so that's another Mega to think about.
Saying that I agree with making mega_evolution a tag

Updated by anonymous

Rainbow_Dash said:
Do we really need all these? If we do one of you better help out and start creating these implications

This is the preferred way for members to mass-suggest large numbers of aliases/implications, yes. Better than having the forum spammed with 10 or 20 new threads.

Updated by anonymous

Jade_Angel said:
There is now Mega Charizard X... so that's another Mega to think about.
Saying that I agree with making mega_evolution a tag

As much as I love pokemon, if every mega evolution has an alternate for each version, I think that's maybe too much.

I suppose it drives game sales, for those who might have only bought one or the other.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1