What's the rule on interspecies impregnation? Shouldn't it just be insemination? Unless I'm mistaken, dogs cannot get human women pregnant. Or horses. Or any other animal.

in real life yes, but furry logic is the law of the land here, so species impregnating each other get tagged with interspecies and impregnation, regardless of how imposable the circumstances may seem

But I don't think it should be tagged for generic cum_inside images, especially not for interspecies. Since there's no indication of actual impregnation, tagging it as such seems contrary to TWYS.

Genjar said:
But I don't think it should be tagged for generic cum_inside images, especially not for interspecies. Since there's no indication of actual impregnation, tagging it as such seems contrary to TWYS.

I'm just talking when you know it is impregnation like when an internal view is shown.

If it is just regular cumming_inside, then just tag it as such and don't assume they are being impregnated

If you wanna be super technical about it, the sperm of most mammals behave in the same way as a humans. The sperm would break through the eggs' membrane and die about a half second later, but for that half second you might consider it a pregnancy.
Science!

elad said:
If you wanna be super technical about it, the sperm of most mammals behave in the same way as a humans. The sperm would break through the eggs' membrane and die about a half second later, but for that half second you might consider it a pregnancy.
Science!

The more you know

the impregnation tag needs a lot of cleaning because like 70% of it is just regular cum_inside pics

Mutisija said:
the impregnation tag needs a lot of cleaning because like 70% of it is just regular cum_inside pics

Just went through three pages at the start, and another three at random later in the archive. The vast majority of them show some form of indication that the person being fucked and cummed inside of is getting impregnated in some way. So your 70% is pure hyperbole.

Based on the impregnation wiki entry, it should be tagged for pretty much every straight image with internal cumshots.

Though that's not a definition I agree with. I think we should use the tag the same way the other image boards use it: only for actual impregnations, not just potential ones.

Here's the Danbooru definition, for example:

Either an actual depiction of a sperm cell hitting an egg, or a scene where the female is saying that she will become pregnant as a result of being cum inside.

Genjar said:
Based on the impregnation wiki entry, it should be tagged for pretty much every straight image with internal cumshots.

Though that's not a definition I agree with. I think we should use the tag the same way the other image boards use it: only for actual impregnations, not just potential ones.

Here's the Danbooru definition, for example:

I agree to changing the wiki

It's already being tagged (mostly) appropriately for the altered wiki definition, so sounds good to me.