So many Goodra pictures are tagged with the "slug" tag. Goodra is not a slug. It is a slime/dragon hybrid if you must, or it is a Goodra. As such, the "slug" tag needs to be removed from any Goodra image that does not contain an actual slug.

go ahead

I went ahead and removed some of the least sluglike ones, though there's still plenty left.

Pokemon species in general are a mess.
It's bit of a problem when images such as...
post #396737
...get consistently tagged as dragon.

Genjar said:
I went ahead and removed some of the least sluglike ones, though there's still plenty left.

Pokemon species in general are a mess.
It's bit of a problem when images such as...
post #396737
...get consistently tagged as dragon.

...Well, there's SOME resemblance to the Lung dragon.... >_>

123easy said:
...Well, there's SOME resemblance to the Lung dragon.... >_>

Resemblance doesn't make it a slug.

Sounds like we need a "dragon_type_pokemon".
Since goodra is a dragon type, but not really what we'd call a "dragon" typically.

Go on

Halite said:
Sounds like we need a "dragon_type_pokemon".
Since goodra is a dragon type, but not really what we'd call a "dragon" typically.

Sounds like dragon_(pokemon) suffices for that sort of tag variant.

123easy said:
Sounds like dragon_(pokemon) suffices for that sort of tag variant.

That's not really what it is though.
It's a dragon type pokemon, not a dragon.
dragon_type would be valid, if something shorter would be desirable.

Halite said:
That's not really what it is though.
It's a dragon type pokemon, not a dragon.
dragon_type would be valid, if something shorter would be desirable.

It's a dragon, from the pokemon series. dragon_(pokemon) is perfectly valid. (This in no way implies that dragon_type is not valid as well; however, the *_(<seriesname>) format has precedence for tag standardization)

I looks like a sea slug/leech combo...

Moon_Moon said:
I looks like a sea slug/leech combo...

In that image it does, for whatever reason. The actual pokemon it's referencing does not, however.

I think the picture in this thread is supposed to be just their penises..

Lucali said:
I think the picture in this thread is supposed to be just their penises..

That would be correct, was someone not realizing that?

123easy said:
It's a dragon, from the pokemon series. dragon_(pokemon) is perfectly valid. (This in no way implies that dragon_type is not valid as well; however, the *_(<seriesname>) format has precedence for tag standardization)

Sounds good in theory, but I expect that they'd still be tagged as dragon instead of dragon_(pokemon). And we'd need to make tons of implications for the type-tags to work well. Poor RD.

Halite said:
That would be correct, was someone not realizing that?

...i'll admit, I didn't think that in the least. Thought it was someone doing some sort of realistic look to them. *shrug*

123easy said:
...i'll admit, I didn't think that in the least. Thought it was someone doing some sort of realistic look to them. *shrug*

Fair enough, that artist has a series of pokemon penises.