Apparently, that dude has made a hobby of removing tags, he seems to have a problem with the rule_34 one in particular.

the whole list: http://e621.net/post_tag_history?page=1&user_id=4277

SpanKing said:
Apparently, that dude has made a hobby of removing tags, he seems to have a problem with the rule_34 one in particular.

the whole list: http://e621.net/post_tag_history?page=1&user_id=4277

So? The tag is fucking use less any way.

Fox2K9 said:
So? The tag is fucking useless any way.

Yes and no. Although I think "Rule 34" Danbooru may be a better place to look for them imho. It's not really our focus.

It may not be our focus but there's no harm in having it here either. It's not a tag I use but a few people have and 240 pictures isn't unsubstantial. I just thought I'd let you guys know, but if it doesn't bother anyone, why not let him proceed

While I don't particularly mind the rule_34 tag one way or the other being that it's a pretty universal concept at this point, I went over the list and I don't see much problem with the tag changes he's made. The changes don't seem vindictive or destructive, and a lot of them are removals of inaccurate tags anyways. I'll keep tabs on it but for now he's not doing anything that warrants any immediate action.

Feel free to add the rule_34 tags back if you like, or not, it's one of those tags I can really go either way on.

It seems like rule_34 could potentially be a tag some people would blacklist, for wanting to see furry porn without risk of childhood memories being ruined.

Of course, whether or not anyone has actually thought to blacklist it is another story entirely.

In a way, rule 34 is for explicit fan artwork. As apposed to Original explicit artwork.

Although it usually doesn't apply to other people's furnsona's to my knowledge.