https://e621.net/post/show/652657

I was following an admin's (ippiki ookami) advice, didn't realize that half a page down another admin flipped it. Don't think I should get a neutral for admin indecision or at least just say something instead of a mark, as I was thinking I was just following admin advice. . .

My only question is why doesn't it have the twilight_sparkle_(mlp) tag too?

CamKitty said:
[...]didn't realize that half a page down another admin flipped it.[...]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2YDs23eq_YBX3dGWkJEQ2VmS1U/view

The rule is: The character names an artist assigns to it are allowed to stay as long as nothing in the picture itself contradicts those names.

NotMeNotYou said:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2YDs23eq_YBX3dGWkJEQ2VmS1U/view

The rule is: The character names an artist assigns to it are allowed to stay as long as nothing in the picture itself contradicts those names.

Which, prior, Ippiki had decided wass not the case. I know the rule, been here a while you know, but apparently I should revisit and reread the comments on a pic in case an admin decision gets flipped on it's head?

CamKitty said:
Which, prior, Ippiki had decided wass not the case. I know the rule, been here a while you know, but apparently I should revisit and reread the comments on a pic in case an admin decision gets flipped on it's head?

Click the link again, I forgot to set the proper permissions.

NotMeNotYou said:
Click the link again, I forgot to set the proper permissions.

Yes, rethought sass at an admin, so at this point 2 admins disagreeing. So, at the time, I should have believed Char over Ippiki because . . .

CamKitty said:
Yes, rethought sass at an admin, so at this point 2 admins disagreeing. So, at the time, I should have believed Char over Ippiki because . . .

You have to listen to ALL the admins at the same time. That's the trick.

CamKitty said:
Yes, rethought sass at an admin, so at this point 2 admins disagreeing. So, at the time, I should have believed Char over Ippiki because . . .

Generally listen to the last admin, we do sometimes talk with each other and have one answer (and overrule) the admins before that. Probably causes confusion because we basically never hide what the other admin said.

The only exception to "listen to the last admin" would be with Dave, Dasa, and I, if we say something treat is as the law until either of us says something different (or if the other admin says that they have our consensus).

NotMeNotYou said:
Generally listen to the last admin, we do sometimes talk with each other and have one answer (and overrule) the admins before that. Probably causes confusion because we basically never hide what the other admin said.

The only exception to "listen to the last admin" would be with Dave, Dasa, and I, if we say something treat is as the law until either of us says something different (or if the other admin says that they have our consensus).

Fine, if that is how it goes. I was not aware of the "last admin" thing. Can we still lose the neutral since I was not aware of that particular rule?

lol like this site has a tagging policy anymore

Neutrals neither decrease nor increase the size of one's e-peen.

null0010 said:
lol like this site has a tagging policy anymore

parabot is the site's tagging policy

Lance_Armstrong said:
Neutrals neither decrease nor increase the size of one's e-peen.

parabot is the site's tagging policy

i disagree neutrals are actually very passive-aggressive warnings

null0010 said:
lol like this site has a tagging policy anymore

Hey null!

Dragonlayer said:
i disagree neutrals are actually very passive-aggressive warnings

This, more or less. If this variation of who to listen to is "the last admin to say something", fine, I get it, I don't need a mark on my account about it.

CamKitty said:
This, more or less. If this variation of who to listen to is "the last admin to say something", fine, I get it, I don't need a mark on my account about it.

I'd normally remove it but:

CamKitty said:
[...]didn't realize that half a page down another admin flipped it.[...]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2YDs23eq_YBX3dGWkJEQ2VmS1U/view

You knew very well what another admin said, and you've been around long enough to know that in tagging disputes you report the thing in a ticket. Especially if you're unsure about what to do shouldn't your first instinct be "I'll ignore one admin and do what another says".
If we do something stupid bring it up with us first.

NotMeNotYou said:
I'd normally remove it but:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2YDs23eq_YBX3dGWkJEQ2VmS1U/view

You knew very well what another admin said, and you've been around long enough to know that in tagging disputes you report the thing in a ticket. Especially if you're unsure about what to do shouldn't your first instinct be "I'll ignore one admin and do what another says".
If we do something stupid bring it up with us first.

Knowing that another admin said something is one thing, being punished because I am supposed to know that it immediately supersedes the last admin statement is another