Also, if I had a dollar for everytime I've seen people label porn of fictional underage characters as "drawn CP" on Twitter, I'd be able to buy some food with it. People throw around that term around a lot for art and it just seems very insulting to me, as it makes light of actual victims of predators who were subjected to those horrible practices, people who were subjected to actual trauma. In other words, these people waste their time and energy on their very skewed priorities; these people should go after actual predators instead of witch hunting artists who just so happen to make art of fictional characters who are below 18. Pixels/lines don't have feelings or are able to be harmed. Actual human beings do. You'd think this would be common sense, but what do I know.

Sorry for the long ass rant alongside a nuclear take. Twitter makes me feel these sorts of things.

Responses

In response to blip #105652

@VariableY: I mean, this is the reason why I don't subscribe to "social media".

The only thing I continue to use is YouTube and I don't even use it the same way anybody else does. I always will stand by the fact YouTube was about "Broadcast Yourself", i.e. share whatever you felt like sharing. The fact it has to be "monetized" pisses me off to no end.

  • 1