TheHuskyK9 said:
I like how artists draw the twitter bird as an attractive female bird but then I remember that the official name for the bird is Larry. I don’t know why but that made me exhale through my nose sharply and chuckle

I can only imagine part of why that guy rebranded it as X is because he saw people reading "don't anthropomorphize the twitter bird" brand guideline thing and promptly did the exact opposite of what's written. Even if that isn't the case, there's no stopping anyone from doing it to the new logo anyway. I've seen the extents of what Rule 34 is capable of. But if that's the case, they won't do it because it's hot, but purely out of spite. Actually, it doesn't matter what's anyone's motivation if they want to make one. You do you.

Daleport996 said:
I can only imagine part of why that guy rebranded it as X is because he saw people reading "don't anthropomorphize the twitter bird" brand guideline thing and promptly did the exact opposite of what's written. Even if that isn't the case, there's no stopping anyone from doing it to the new logo anyway. I've seen the extents of what Rule 34 is capable of. But if that's the case, they won't do it because it's hot, but purely out of spite. Actually, it doesn't matter what's anyone's motivation if they want to make one. You do you.

You just reminded me of that weird period of time where people drew alphabet porn after that one animation came out, so it's not like letters are immune to R34.