lurkmore said:
So I just noticed that some but not all animal_humanoid tags implicate their regular common species equivalent. Like, "bat_humanoid" implicates "bat" and "bear- oh fine, ursid_humanoid" - implicates "bear", but "wolf_humanoid" and "fox humanoid" both only implicate "canine" instead of "wolf" or "fox".

I think it's because both bear and bat have as broad meanings as canine.

Implications

• bear -> mammal
• bat -> mammal
• canine -> canid -> mammal

Staff says specific humanoids like fox_humanoid shouldn't imply fox coz most people don't want humanoid when they search for species.

CoffeeCo said:
I think it's because both bear and bat have as broad meanings as canine.

Implications

• bear -> mammal
• bat -> mammal
• canine -> canid -> mammal

Staff says specific humanoids like fox_humanoid shouldn't imply fox coz most people don't want humanoid when they search for species.

I always assumed humanoids were just handily outnumbered. I already usually specify anthro or otherwise. If I think there's too many of something in the results I add an exclusion to the query and move on.