Redid the wikis for frame_by_frame and motion_tweening because for some reason they implied the two were mutually exclusive when that's... Blatantly (and very often) untrue?
Also the motion tweening wiki was just kind of outdated in general :P
Honestly frame_by_frame -motion_tweening could use cleanup bc while looking for examples I found a good handful that used tweening, either partially or even fully...
Nimphia said:
Redid the wikis for frame_by_frame and motion_tweening because for some reason they implied the two were mutually exclusive when that's... Blatantly (and very often) untrue?
Honestly I feel those tags should be used for what the animation style primarily is, not whether any aspect of it has been tweened or has redrawn frames. I doubt people looking for motion tweening are looking for things like post #4487513 (I'm not even sure how that's motion tweening, to be honest?), and I doubt people who blacklist motion tweening will want something like post #4781593 blocked because there's some pan and scan going on for still frames where the animation itself is otherwise frame-by-frame. They're two distinct animation styles that people can have strong preferences for, and I don't think it will be helpful to tag them both when it's primarily one and a minor detail utilizing the other.
