Need help creating the "ever fucked a horse?" tag

In category: Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

So I was actually serious in that comment I made on post #1618709 I would love to see a tag grouping that lewd idea together. But I need help scoping out all the posts that it would apply to, which shouldn't be too many. I'm thinking of naming it ever fucked a horse? and to count for it the dialogue in the post should be asking/suggesting if the viewer or another character in it if they've ever done anything sexual with a horse. Not just asking if you "fucked" a horse, but blowjobs or anything of sexual nature. You guys think you could help me?


Seems unnecessary imo. You might as well just create your own set


I would rather it be a tag tho, there's probably over 25 at least. There's tags with less than that to them. We could have a warning on the wiki for the tag saying to be careful not to comment real life beastiality situations. Come on it'd be fun :P


GlimGlam said:
I would rather it be a tag tho, there's probably over 25 at least. There's tags with less than that to them. We could have a warning on the wiki for the tag saying to be careful not to comment real life beastiality situations. Come on it'd be fun :P

You could start with a set if you're looking for examples of how it should be tagged if it becomes a tag. There's probably a better general name for other types of posts that follow the format. Not to the word, but similar example.
animal_humanoid blush cat_humanoid cowfee english_text feline female fur hair humanoid looking_at_viewer mammal monochrome simple_background smile solo text white_background

Rating: Safe
Score: 43
User: Blind_Guardian
Date: June 03, 2017


Well I guess I could do that and maybe add a tag for them later. What would be a good name for it?

Munkelzahn
Privileged
5 days ago
69_position 9/11 aircraft airplane animate_inanimate anthro anthrofied avian balls beak bird blue_background blue_feathers building cloud cum cumshot cunnilingus ejaculation english_text erection feathers fellatio female glans grey_body group holding_penis humanoid_penis humor johnny_ryan living_aircraft living_machine lol_comments long_tongue machine male male/female markings masturbation ms_paint not_furry_focus nude oral orgasm outside penile_masturbation penis pubes public pussy red_markings sex simple_background sky skyscraper tail_feathers text tongue toony vaginal voyeur what where_is_your_god_now white_body why

Rating: Explicit
Score: -1166
User: Munkelzahn
Date: September 16, 2013

GlimGlam said:
Well I guess I could do that and maybe add a tag for them later. What would be a good name for it?

the_bestiality_question


Munkelzahn said:
the_bestiality_question

I was going for horses/equines not everything. But we could create a tag for that since there would be a lot more that applied to it


So... better idea! Lets find posts like that cat one and do like I said except with all things feral. I could see that tag working pretty good. I've never actually used sets before tbh, but they seem easy. If we did the beastiality question it would be better as a tag instead of a set. We have tags like lol comments, why not have another silly tag like this?

Genjar
Former Staff
5 days ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clothed clothing crossed_arms cute duo feral front_view green_body human insect insect_wings lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 286
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

Should be a set, since dialogue has no weight in tagging and should generally be ignored altogether.


Genjar said:
Should be a set, since dialogue has no weight in tagging and should generally be ignored altogether.

Uh...who says?

I think the 900+ profanity tag would like a word with you.

leomole
Privileged
5 days ago
2014 anthro bottle bottomless cat chair clothed clothing computer desk feline fur girly headphones hoodie inside jailbird leaning leaning_back legwear liam looking_at_viewer looking_back male mammal reclining sitting smile socks solo tan_fur

Rating: Safe
Score: 129
User: Onii-chan
Date: May 09, 2014

This would be more appropriate as a set not a tag.

Genjar
Former Staff
5 days ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clothed clothing crossed_arms cute duo feral front_view green_body human insect insect_wings lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 286
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

Dyrone said:
Uh...who says?

The admins, most recently on discord a few days ago.

Text has no bearing when tagging, 'tag what you see' doesn't apply to the text content. There are a few rare exceptions such as the incest which would be untaggable otherwise, but beyond that text content should be ignored.

Same goes for ratings. Swearing and profanity do not affect the rating at all, or at least that's how it was the last time I asked.

Not a rule that I personally agree with (and it doesn't make much sense when we have content such as CoC, and other text-only games), but that's how it's been as long as I remember.


Plus every post tagged annoyed, unamused, angry or any other emotion tag cuz a character is offscreen but speaking through a speech bubble and the dialogue shows how they feel. Anyways give me some opinions, should I forget about my dream of having a tag that makes it easier to see the funny comments people make in those type posts, or is having a tag based off the lewd beastiality question a neat idea? I don't care about making a set, I barely ever browse since I spend most of my time posting


Well since everybody seems to think a set would be best, I'll just forget about it :( It's like 3:30 in my time zone so I need to sleep. It would be too much work trying to find all the posts anyways. Sorry @thebronyvamp it sounded like a great idea but it's unnecessary


GlimGlam said:
Plus every post tagged annoyed, unamused, angry or any other emotion tag cuz a character is offscreen but speaking through a speech bubble and the dialogue shows how they feel

unless there is some sort of smiley faces that show the emotion, its incorrectly tagged. those tags are for facial expressions. also i feel like the ”every post” here is.. lightly put exaggerated.


siikaprinssi said:
unless there is some sort of smiley faces that show the emotion, its incorrectly tagged. those tags are for facial expressions. also i feel like the ”every post” here is.. lightly put exaggerated.

Yeah I kinda go ocd with the tags. I could probably just have 30 something in some of my posts but I tag literally everything I see that has a tag set to it and end up with over 80. I always put the text into consideration if it's dialogue, but I didn't know the tag what you see doesn't count for that. A lot of users are fine with just the character, copyright, species, and what they're doing. But I tag articles of clothing, hair and eye color, location, position and everything, even eyebrows and eyelashes


Genjar said:
Text has no bearing when tagging, 'tag what you see' doesn't apply to the text content.

text, english_text, engrish, japanese_text, translation_request, profanity, tagging_guidelines_illustrated, humor, meme


BlackLicorice said:
text, english_text, engrish, japanese_text, translation_request, profanity, tagging_guidelines_illustrated, humor, meme

All of those exceptions have a clear and broadly used function. A "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag would be about as useful as tagging every single word in a speech bubble.


NotMeNotYou said:
All of those exceptions have a clear and broadly used function. A "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag would be about as useful as tagging every single word in a speech bubble.

I wasn't defending the "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag (I think it's stupid lolz), I was just pointing out that "text has no bearing when tagging" is wrong! I should have made that clear, my bad.


BlackLicorice said:
I wasn't defending the "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag (I think it's stupid lolz), I was just pointing out that "text has no bearing when tagging" is wrong! I should have made that clear, my bad.

To be fair, the "has no bearing" is explicitly for tags that need to be verified visually. A character saying they're a girl doesn't matter, they will be tagged on visual characteristics only. Nothing what the text itself says is relevant to tagging (with the exception of stuff like incest that can't be seen otherwise).


NotMeNotYou said:
To be fair, the "has no bearing" is explicitly for tags that need to be verified visually. A character saying they're a girl doesn't matter, they will be tagged on visual characteristics only. Nothing what the text itself says is relevant to tagging (with the exception of stuff like incest that can't be seen otherwise).

Ohhh ok. I get it now :3 That makes sense!

Clawdragons
Privileged
4 days ago
4_fingers all_fours ambiguous_gender claws dragon feral gemskull green_eyes horn lying nude open_mouth sandwing_(wof) scales sharp_teeth simple_background smile solo sunny_(wof) teeth wings wings_of_fire yellow_scales

Rating: Safe
Score: 42
User: Rigma
Date: December 19, 2017

Have you made the set for this?

If so:

2015 <3 amputee anatomically_correct anatomically_correct_pussy animal_genitalia animal_pussy anus arm_warmers armwear beauty_mark bed big_teats black_hair blush bridle butt clitoral_winking clitoris clothing darkened_genitals dialogue dock english_text equine equine_pussy erect_nipples etheross female feral feral_lingerie feral_with_hair flower flower_in_hair hair hooves horse inside inviting leg_warmers legwear lingerie lying mammal nipples on_back on_bed plant presenting presenting_pussy presenting_teats prosthetic pussy solo spread_legs spreading teats text thigh_highs underhoof

Rating: Explicit
Score: 322
User: Alumnus
Date: August 29, 2015 2016 ambiguous_gender black_and_white blush child comic dialogue duo english_text equine female feral hair hi_res horn human humor joke larger_female lightsource male mammal monochrome open_mouth signature size_difference sky smaller_male smile sparkles speech_bubble star stella-chan suggestive text unicorn young

Rating: Questionable
Score: 92
User: Blind_Guardian
Date: March 05, 2016

A couple of good additions to it.


As a thought, I wonder if something like "have you ever X'd a Y" would be more appropriate.. that way you can get into riding horses, stroking pussies, fucking dogs, etc.

That said, if it's a set, it can be horses only -- I"d love to see another set for all the critters, though :D


Someone else can make a set if they want, I don't really have the time to find and add them myself. I might be getting a job at Petsmart or somewhere soon


Only picture I can think of with this trope (took me way too long to find) 2017 anthro blue_eyes blush claws clothing dialogue digimon digimon_(species) digiphilia duo ear_tuft english_text erection fangs feline female fur furryseb gatomon gloves grey_background hand_on_penis happy hi_res holding_penis human human_on_anthro humanoid_penis interspecies kekitopu larger_male male male/female mammal meme nude open_mouth open_smile penis purple_fur saliva saliva_string simple_background size_difference small_dom_big_sub smaller_female smile solo_focus speech_bubble striped_tail stripes tail_ring talking_to_viewer teeth text tongue tuft vein whiskers white_fur

Rating: Explicit
Score: 135
User: furryseb
Date: May 21, 2017. Not a horse though.

EDIT: after going through a gajillion more posts I found a few others: post #1063730, post #1017704, post #1326875, post #1553673, post #1571847, post #1508082 & post #1508084, and post #624781 & post #677349.


That example is part of the "what's wrong, big boy?" meme. Should it have it's own set?