Need help creating the "ever fucked a horse?" tag

In category: Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

So I was actually serious in that comment I made on post #1618709 I would love to see a tag grouping that lewd idea together. But I need help scoping out all the posts that it would apply to, which shouldn't be too many. I'm thinking of naming it ever fucked a horse? and to count for it the dialogue in the post should be asking/suggesting if the viewer or another character in it if they've ever done anything sexual with a horse. Not just asking if you "fucked" a horse, but blowjobs or anything of sexual nature. You guys think you could help me?


Seems unnecessary imo. You might as well just create your own set


I would rather it be a tag tho, there's probably over 25 at least. There's tags with less than that to them. We could have a warning on the wiki for the tag saying to be careful not to comment real life beastiality situations. Come on it'd be fun :P


GlimGlam said:
I would rather it be a tag tho, there's probably over 25 at least. There's tags with less than that to them. We could have a warning on the wiki for the tag saying to be careful not to comment real life beastiality situations. Come on it'd be fun :P

You could start with a set if you're looking for examples of how it should be tagged if it becomes a tag. There's probably a better general name for other types of posts that follow the format. Not to the word, but similar example.
alice_in_wonderland animal_humanoid blush cat_humanoid cheshire_cat cheshire_cat_(mge) cowfee english_text felid felid_humanoid feline feline_humanoid female fur hair humanoid looking_at_viewer mammal monochrome monster_girl monster_girl_encyclopedia monster_girl_(genre) simple_background smile solo text white_background

Rating: Safe
Score: 57
User: Blind_Guardian
Date: June 03, 2017


Well I guess I could do that and maybe add a tag for them later. What would be a good name for it?


GlimGlam said:
Well I guess I could do that and maybe add a tag for them later. What would be a good name for it?

the_bestiality_question


Munkelzahn said:
the_bestiality_question

I was going for horses/equines not everything. But we could create a tag for that since there would be a lot more that applied to it


So... better idea! Lets find posts like that cat one and do like I said except with all things feral. I could see that tag working pretty good. I've never actually used sets before tbh, but they seem easy. If we did the beastiality question it would be better as a tag instead of a set. We have tags like lol comments, why not have another silly tag like this?

Genjar
Former Staff
5 months ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clothed clothing crossed_arms duo feral front_view green_body hawk_moth human insect insect_wings lepidopteran lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 309
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

Should be a set, since dialogue has no weight in tagging and should generally be ignored altogether.


Genjar said:
Should be a set, since dialogue has no weight in tagging and should generally be ignored altogether.

Uh...who says?

I think the 900+ profanity tag would like a word with you.

leomole
Privileged
5 months ago
2014 anthro bottle bottomless chair clothed clothing computer desk domestic_cat felid feline felis fur girly headphones hoodie inside jailbird leaning leaning_back legwear liam looking_at_viewer looking_back male mammal reclining sitting smile socks solo tan_fur

Rating: Safe
Score: 141
User: Onii-chan
Date: May 09, 2014

This would be more appropriate as a set not a tag.

Genjar
Former Staff
5 months ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clothed clothing crossed_arms duo feral front_view green_body hawk_moth human insect insect_wings lepidopteran lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 309
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

Dyrone said:
Uh...who says?

The admins, most recently on discord a few days ago.

Text has no bearing when tagging, 'tag what you see' doesn't apply to the text content. There are a few rare exceptions such as the incest which would be untaggable otherwise, but beyond that text content should be ignored.

Same goes for ratings. Swearing and profanity do not affect the rating at all, or at least that's how it was the last time I asked.

Not a rule that I personally agree with (and it doesn't make much sense when we have content such as CoC, and other text-only games), but that's how it's been as long as I remember.


Plus every post tagged annoyed, unamused, angry or any other emotion tag cuz a character is offscreen but speaking through a speech bubble and the dialogue shows how they feel. Anyways give me some opinions, should I forget about my dream of having a tag that makes it easier to see the funny comments people make in those type posts, or is having a tag based off the lewd beastiality question a neat idea? I don't care about making a set, I barely ever browse since I spend most of my time posting


Well since everybody seems to think a set would be best, I'll just forget about it :( It's like 3:30 in my time zone so I need to sleep. It would be too much work trying to find all the posts anyways. Sorry @thebronyvamp it sounded like a great idea but it's unnecessary

Ruikuli
Privileged
5 months ago
2017 abstract_background ambiguous_gender animal_humanoid blue_eyes cat_humanoid clothing cnidarian felid felid_humanoid feline feline_humanoid fingerless_gloves gloves group hair humanoid jacket jellyfish kuroblood mammal marine medusozoan open_mouth solo_focus teeth

Rating: Safe
Score: 4
User: Ruikuli
Date: August 21, 2018

GlimGlam said:
Plus every post tagged annoyed, unamused, angry or any other emotion tag cuz a character is offscreen but speaking through a speech bubble and the dialogue shows how they feel

unless there is some sort of smiley faces that show the emotion, its incorrectly tagged. those tags are for facial expressions. also i feel like the ”every post” here is.. lightly put exaggerated.


siikaprinssi said:
unless there is some sort of smiley faces that show the emotion, its incorrectly tagged. those tags are for facial expressions. also i feel like the ”every post” here is.. lightly put exaggerated.

Yeah I kinda go ocd with the tags. I could probably just have 30 something in some of my posts but I tag literally everything I see that has a tag set to it and end up with over 80. I always put the text into consideration if it's dialogue, but I didn't know the tag what you see doesn't count for that. A lot of users are fine with just the character, copyright, species, and what they're doing. But I tag articles of clothing, hair and eye color, location, position and everything, even eyebrows and eyelashes


Genjar said:
Text has no bearing when tagging, 'tag what you see' doesn't apply to the text content.

text, english_text, engrish, japanese_text, translation_request, profanity, tagging_guidelines_illustrated, humor, meme


BlackLicorice said:
text, english_text, engrish, japanese_text, translation_request, profanity, tagging_guidelines_illustrated, humor, meme

All of those exceptions have a clear and broadly used function. A "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag would be about as useful as tagging every single word in a speech bubble.


NotMeNotYou said:
All of those exceptions have a clear and broadly used function. A "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag would be about as useful as tagging every single word in a speech bubble.

I wasn't defending the "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag (I think it's stupid lolz), I was just pointing out that "text has no bearing when tagging" is wrong! I should have made that clear, my bad.


BlackLicorice said:
I wasn't defending the "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag (I think it's stupid lolz), I was just pointing out that "text has no bearing when tagging" is wrong! I should have made that clear, my bad.

To be fair, the "has no bearing" is explicitly for tags that need to be verified visually. A character saying they're a girl doesn't matter, they will be tagged on visual characteristics only. Nothing what the text itself says is relevant to tagging (with the exception of stuff like incest that can't be seen otherwise).


NotMeNotYou said:
To be fair, the "has no bearing" is explicitly for tags that need to be verified visually. A character saying they're a girl doesn't matter, they will be tagged on visual characteristics only. Nothing what the text itself says is relevant to tagging (with the exception of stuff like incest that can't be seen otherwise).

Ohhh ok. I get it now :3 That makes sense!


Have you made the set for this?

If so:

2015 <3 amputee anatomically_correct anatomically_correct_pussy animal_genitalia animal_pussy anus arm_warmers armwear beauty_mark bed big_teats black_hair blush bridle butt clitoral_winking clitoris clothing darkened_genitals dialogue dock english_text equine equine_pussy erect_nipples etheross female feral feral_with_hair flower flower_in_hair hair hooves horse inside inviting leg_warmers legwear lingerie lying mammal nipples on_back on_bed plant presenting presenting_pussy presenting_teats prosthetic pussy solo spreading spread_legs teats text thigh_highs underhoof

Rating: Explicit
Score: 331
User: Alumnus
Date: August 29, 2015 2016 ambiguous_gender black_and_white blush child comic dialogue dirty_talk duo english_text equine female feral hair hi_res horn human humor joke larger_female larger_feral lightsource male mammal monochrome open_mouth signature size_difference sky smaller_human smaller_male smile sparkles speech_bubble star stella-chan suggestive text unicorn young

Rating: Questionable
Score: 113
User: Blind_Guardian
Date: March 05, 2016

A couple of good additions to it.


As a thought, I wonder if something like "have you ever X'd a Y" would be more appropriate.. that way you can get into riding horses, stroking pussies, fucking dogs, etc.

That said, if it's a set, it can be horses only -- I"d love to see another set for all the critters, though :D


Someone else can make a set if they want, I don't really have the time to find and add them myself. I might be getting a job at Petsmart or somewhere soon


Only picture I can think of with this trope (took me way too long to find) 2017 anthro blue_eyes blush claws clothing dialogue digimon digimon_(species) digiphilia duo ear_tuft english_text erection fangs felid female fur furryseb gatomon gloves grey_background hand_on_penis happy hi_res holding_penis human humanoid_penis human_on_anthro interspecies kekitopu larger_male male male/female mammal meme nude open_mouth open_smile penis purple_fur saliva saliva_string simple_background size_difference small_dom_big_sub smaller_female smile solo_focus speech_bubble striped_tail stripes tail_ring talking_to_viewer teeth text tongue tuft vein whiskers white_fur

Rating: Explicit
Score: 140
User: furryseb
Date: May 21, 2017. Not a horse though.

EDIT: after going through a gajillion more posts I found a few others: post #1063730, post #1017704, post #1326875, post #1553673, post #1571847, post #1508082 & post #1508084, and post #624781 & post #677349.


That example is part of the "what's wrong, big boy?" meme. Should it have it's own set?