So I was actually serious in that comment I made on post #1618709 I would love to see a tag grouping that lewd idea together. But I need help scoping out all the posts that it would apply to, which shouldn't be too many. I'm thinking of naming it ever fucked a horse? and to count for it the dialogue in the post should be asking/suggesting if the viewer or another character in it if they've ever done anything sexual with a horse. Not just asking if you "fucked" a horse, but blowjobs or anything of sexual nature. You guys think you could help me?

Seems unnecessary imo. You might as well just create your own set

I would rather it be a tag tho, there's probably over 25 at least. There's tags with less than that to them. We could have a warning on the wiki for the tag saying to be careful not to comment real life beastiality situations. Come on it'd be fun :P

GlimGlam said:
I would rather it be a tag tho, there's probably over 25 at least. There's tags with less than that to them. We could have a warning on the wiki for the tag saying to be careful not to comment real life beastiality situations. Come on it'd be fun :P

You could start with a set if you're looking for examples of how it should be tagged if it becomes a tag. There's probably a better general name for other types of posts that follow the format. Not to the word, but similar example.
post #1233834

Well I guess I could do that and maybe add a tag for them later. What would be a good name for it?

GlimGlam said:
Well I guess I could do that and maybe add a tag for them later. What would be a good name for it?

the_bestiality_question

Munkelzahn said:
the_bestiality_question

I was going for horses/equines not everything. But we could create a tag for that since there would be a lot more that applied to it

So... better idea! Lets find posts like that cat one and do like I said except with all things feral. I could see that tag working pretty good. I've never actually used sets before tbh, but they seem easy. If we did the beastiality question it would be better as a tag instead of a set. We have tags like lol comments, why not have another silly tag like this?

Should be a set, since dialogue has no weight in tagging and should generally be ignored altogether.

Genjar said:
Should be a set, since dialogue has no weight in tagging and should generally be ignored altogether.

Uh...who says?

I think the 900+ profanity tag would like a word with you.

This would be more appropriate as a set not a tag.

Dyrone said:
Uh...who says?

The admins, most recently on discord a few days ago.

Text has no bearing when tagging, 'tag what you see' doesn't apply to the text content. There are a few rare exceptions such as the incest which would be untaggable otherwise, but beyond that text content should be ignored.

Same goes for ratings. Swearing and profanity do not affect the rating at all, or at least that's how it was the last time I asked.

Not a rule that I personally agree with (and it doesn't make much sense when we have content such as CoC, and other text-only games), but that's how it's been as long as I remember.

Plus every post tagged annoyed, unamused, angry or any other emotion tag cuz a character is offscreen but speaking through a speech bubble and the dialogue shows how they feel. Anyways give me some opinions, should I forget about my dream of having a tag that makes it easier to see the funny comments people make in those type posts, or is having a tag based off the lewd beastiality question a neat idea? I don't care about making a set, I barely ever browse since I spend most of my time posting

Well since everybody seems to think a set would be best, I'll just forget about it :( It's like 3:30 in my time zone so I need to sleep. It would be too much work trying to find all the posts anyways. Sorry @thebronyvamp it sounded like a great idea but it's unnecessary

GlimGlam said:
Plus every post tagged annoyed, unamused, angry or any other emotion tag cuz a character is offscreen but speaking through a speech bubble and the dialogue shows how they feel

unless there is some sort of smiley faces that show the emotion, its incorrectly tagged. those tags are for facial expressions. also i feel like the ”every post” here is.. lightly put exaggerated.

siikaprinssi said:
unless there is some sort of smiley faces that show the emotion, its incorrectly tagged. those tags are for facial expressions. also i feel like the ”every post” here is.. lightly put exaggerated.

Yeah I kinda go ocd with the tags. I could probably just have 30 something in some of my posts but I tag literally everything I see that has a tag set to it and end up with over 80. I always put the text into consideration if it's dialogue, but I didn't know the tag what you see doesn't count for that. A lot of users are fine with just the character, copyright, species, and what they're doing. But I tag articles of clothing, hair and eye color, location, position and everything, even eyebrows and eyelashes

Genjar said:
Text has no bearing when tagging, 'tag what you see' doesn't apply to the text content.

text, english_text, engrish, japanese_text, translation_request, profanity, tagging_guidelines_illustrated, humor, meme

BlackLicorice said:
text, english_text, engrish, japanese_text, translation_request, profanity, tagging_guidelines_illustrated, humor, meme

All of those exceptions have a clear and broadly used function. A "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag would be about as useful as tagging every single word in a speech bubble.

NotMeNotYou said:
All of those exceptions have a clear and broadly used function. A "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag would be about as useful as tagging every single word in a speech bubble.

I wasn't defending the "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag (I think it's stupid lolz), I was just pointing out that "text has no bearing when tagging" is wrong! I should have made that clear, my bad.

BlackLicorice said:
I wasn't defending the "ever_fucked_a_horse" tag (I think it's stupid lolz), I was just pointing out that "text has no bearing when tagging" is wrong! I should have made that clear, my bad.

To be fair, the "has no bearing" is explicitly for tags that need to be verified visually. A character saying they're a girl doesn't matter, they will be tagged on visual characteristics only. Nothing what the text itself says is relevant to tagging (with the exception of stuff like incest that can't be seen otherwise).

NotMeNotYou said:
To be fair, the "has no bearing" is explicitly for tags that need to be verified visually. A character saying they're a girl doesn't matter, they will be tagged on visual characteristics only. Nothing what the text itself says is relevant to tagging (with the exception of stuff like incest that can't be seen otherwise).

Ohhh ok. I get it now :3 That makes sense!

Have you made the set for this?

If so:

post #717737 post #842808

A couple of good additions to it.

As a thought, I wonder if something like "have you ever X'd a Y" would be more appropriate.. that way you can get into riding horses, stroking pussies, fucking dogs, etc.

That said, if it's a set, it can be horses only -- I"d love to see another set for all the critters, though :D

Someone else can make a set if they want, I don't really have the time to find and add them myself. I might be getting a job at Petsmart or somewhere soon

Only picture I can think of with this trope (took me way too long to find) post #1222361. Not a horse though.

EDIT: after going through a gajillion more posts I found a few others: post #1063730, post #1017704, post #1326875, post #1553673, post #1571847, post #1508082 & post #1508084, and post #624781 & post #677349.

That example is part of the "what's wrong, big boy?" meme. Should it have it's own set?

I mean, a_cat_is_fine_too and Dragons_having_sex_with_cars are allowed to be tags of a meme, If you're able to find the posts for it go right ahead I think.

Volteer133 said:
I mean, a_cat_is_fine_too and Dragons_having_sex_with_cars are allowed to be tags of a meme, If you're able to find the posts for it go right ahead I think.

time stamps my guy. this is 9 months old thread and the person already got an answer from admins.