I feel that there should be a tag for posts like
post #2003135 post #1807381 post #406249

It's technically castration, however castration implies genital_mutilation, which implies genital_torture. There is no mutilation or torture going on in these images, so that's one problem. The other problem is that castration is too general.

Some options I can think of:

• ball_ejection
• ball_ejaculation
• ball_extraction
• soft_castration
• passing_balls
• wont_need_those
• cleaning_inventory

etc

I think there should be a umbrella tag for particularly unusual sex acts.

That's a bit tangential, but I think it would be nice for grouping various things that might not be highly populated on their own, and also help with noticing when certain things reoccur enough to deserve their own tag.

what.

In all seriousness, we won't be using

passing_balls
wont_need_those
cleaning_inventory

However, ball_ejeculation seems like the best fit.

Chaser said:
what.

In all seriousness, we won't be using However, ball_ejeculation seems like the best fit.

Ball ejaculating seems like a subset of the overall theme, and wouldn't include balls being sucked out without orgasm / ejaculation.

I didn't know this existed.
Thanks internet!

well that's a kink that sounds rather odd, but ball_ejaculation sounds like the best fit.

Semi-related but, castration is torture?

Castration by itself only means the cease of a male's reproductive function. Altho on this site it's defined as the removal of testicles, the inclusion of gore, pain, or scrotum damage is not necessary.

Based on how genital_mutilation is currently defined (pain/torture being unnecessary for mutilation to occur), I'd like to request for the genital_mutilation -> genital_torture implication to be removed.

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Semi-related but, castration is torture?

I dont consider it torture, considering the amount of art where the castration is clearly consensual.

Oh hey, one of my comms is an example (middle), neat.

I agree with clawdragons though, having a particular tag may miss the mark of covering these kinds of things, but a particular tag may be necessary for those that wish to focus on a more narrow part of the umbrella.

To go off of OP, I think "testicle_removal" would be better, because that removes the "ejaculation" requirement and it avoids any confusion with sports equipment.

The_Real_Slimshod said:

To go off of OP, I think "testicle_removal" would be better, because that removes the "ejaculation" requirement and it avoids any confusion with sports equipment.

Testicle_removal is way too vague. There is no way to know from the name alone that it's meant for posts of testicles removed through urethra.

fetus_yeetus tag when

would be on the right track, but still sounds too medical and could be understood to mean castration; same with testicle_removal. Come to think of it, "ball(s)" is meant as an ambivalant tag for both the scrotum and the testicles, so "testicle(s)" should be used if such a tag were to be coined.

I'd put a vote on testicle_ejection, but it gives the wrong impression for images that show something more like "testicle stealing".

post #1360093 post #2005190

I guess that only leaves soft_castration, though that would raise questions on whether we want to connect it to castration.

The_Real_Slimshod said:
"testicle_removal"

I think that testicle_removal isn't a good choice because it's synonymous with castration. It's literally what castration is defined as.

Fifteen said:
I guess that only leaves soft_castration, though that would raise questions on whether we want to connect it to castration.

I also think that soft_castration would probably be the best fit. This is because the "removal through urethra" part isn't that important and is a bit too specific. I'd say that it's much more important for the tag to signify that there's no gore and pain involved. Also, if the soft_castration name would be chosen, the "expelling through urethra" part should not be included in the definition because the meaning isn't conveyed through the tag's name. In this case, I would define it as:

• Castration that occurs without pain, gore, and without any visible damage to scrotum or testicles.

So posts such as
post #1512228
would also fall under the definition.

As far as implications go, soft_castration should definitely imply castration. Of course, the implication from castration to mutilation and torture should always be removed.

Perhaps there is some merit in dividing castration into soft_castration and hard_castration, just like there is soft_vore and hard_vore.

Lance_Armstrong said:
urethral_testicle_cannon

Giving a whole new meaning to UTC-2.