I couldn't help but to notice that a person's whose picture I really liked was banned, so I decided to see why and it turns out they were banned for uploading an image of an "UNDERAGED FURRY" then it says wether they are human or not it's considered child pornography... this intruges me as my first month here, I had actually seen multiple posts under the tag of "pedophile" upon me deciding to add that tag to more pictures I got a mark saying it wasn't a valad tag, however, my question is, there is an image on here where a grown animal is raping his cub and many other similar images... my question is, what exactly defines "Furry Child Pornography" if all these other Images aren't. And this time I am asking a valid question so don't be rude.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
I couldn't help but to notice that a person's whose picture I really liked was banned, so I decided to see why and it turns out they were banned for uploading an image of an "UNDERAGED FURRY" then it says wether they are human or not it's considered child pornography... this intruges me as my first month here, I had actually seen multiple posts under the tag of "pedophile" upon me deciding to add that tag to more pictures I got a mark saying it wasn't a valad tag, however, my question is, there is an image on here where a grown animal is raping his cub and many other similar images... my question is, what exactly defines "Furry Child Pornography" if all these other Images aren't. And this time I am asking a valid question so don't be rude.

See through shit disturbing is see through

Defuc did I just read?

They were probably banned for being underage. No one has ever been banned for posting cub art. Should I assume you have no evidence or links to this either?

ippiki_ookami said:
They were probably banned for being underage. No one has ever been banned for posting cub art. Should I assume you have no evidence or links to this either?

No, I'm not making this up, I'll take your word on it but I thought it said for uploading child porn or something along those lines... is it possible they uploaded an actual image of a baby? Either way, I agree I must have read it wrong but I think I can find the link, I know where I was looking when I saw it.

Oh wow, after reading the entire history about InsaineKangaroo, you aren't kidding... thanks, I had NO idea all the shit that E621 had gone through NOR the history of them... curious, if it was taken offline, how did it ever get back online?

And turns out, what had happened was someone was complaining they got banned in a forum or something that they got banned for uploading child porn, I now see that they were lying.

CamKitty said:
See through shit disturbing is see through

The chances of option #2 being true are becoming increasingly slim.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
Oh wow, after reading the entire history about InsaineKangaroo, you aren't kidding... thanks, I had NO idea all the shit that E621 had gone through NOR the history of them... curious, if it was taken offline, how did it ever get back online?

And turns out, what had happened was someone was complaining they got banned in a forum or something that they got banned for uploading child porn, I now see that they were lying.

Okay so you read our wikifur

Aurali said:
Okay so you read our wikifur

And to think he is part of the elite! How could we ever doubt him.

Wait... I don't know what you two thought I was trying to insinuate here but I was giving an honest statement, no I had no idea there was a wikifur, however, I pulled up this story from Google while trying to find the guy who I thought got banned from uploading child porn. I read Kangaroos internet post saying how he won and all that but looks like we are BACK IN THE GAME!!!!!

So my question is... how did the site get back on?

PS. Just read, your WikiFur doesn't tell even HALF the story, this was such an amazing story and battle between you and him and it lasted so long, I wish the entire story was mentioned somewhere in the History section of this site... it's so touching... :'(

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
PS. Just read, your WikiFur doesn't tell even HALF the story, this was such an amazing story and battle between you and him and it lasted so long, I wish the entire story was mentioned somewhere in the History section of this site... it's so touching... :'(

you should spend a ton of time writing it and editing it into the page.

then it'll be reverted and you can make another thread.

Feathering said:
you should spend a ton of time writing it and editing it into the page.

then it'll be reverted and you can make another thread.

I smell an Emmy.

Digital_Kindness said:
I smell an Emmy.

You mean a Pulitzer.

Foobaria said:
You mean a Pulitzer.

Could be an MTV Music Award at the rate he's going.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
Oh wow, after reading the entire history about InsaineKangaroo, you aren't kidding...

Welcome to the darkest side in losers.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
PS. Just read, your WikiFur doesn't tell even HALF the story

Oh like you were there....
were you?
Edit: NO YOU WERENT; IK IS ASEXUAL and doesnt have friends.

The story:

Insane Kangaroo whined that we hosted child porn (untrue), claimed he contacted the FBI (untrue), Arcturus, the owner at the time, was like, "fuck this shit," and Varka was like "hey man wanna sell that site?" and Arcturus was like "k."

End of thing.

Cub art is furry child pornography.
No buts!
That's the definition.
Not calling it by the scary word "pedophilia" but "cub porn" is already a sign that people are hard at work deluding themselves.
See it as what it is "furry child porn" and accept it, or hate it.

Violent "cub" rape:
http://e621.net/post/show/248603

hardcore cubfucking and bondage
http://e621.net/post/show/182420

Fucking your crying daughter in the anus in a park in plain sight
http://e621.net/post/show/89508

Have some more crying children!
http://e621.net/post/show/38227
http://e621.net/post/show/38228
http://e621.net/post/show/47543

null0010 said:
The story:

Insane Kangaroo whined that we hosted child porn (untrue), claimed he contacted the FBI (untrue), Arcturus, the owner at the time, was like, "fuck this shit," and Varka was like "hey man wanna sell that site?" and Arcturus was like "k."

End of thing.

Can you honestly tell me "The images you linked DO NOT IN FACT depict child porn!"?

Don't get me wrong, I am fine with it being here and do have a lot of not-too-guilty faps to cubporn, although luckily it is just a minor fetish to me.

Akkira said:
Can you honestly tell me "The images you linked DO NOT IN FACT depict child porn!"?

Yes. There are no real children in them. Also, if you don't like it, blacklist it.

null0010 said:
Yes. There are no real children in them.

This basically. The law doesn't care if there isn't actual children being harmed in the picture/photo.

Having people beat off to drawings is far preferable to them beating off to a photo that was taken of some abused child somewhere.

Have this thread come to a conclusion?

Keats said:
Have this thread come to a conclusion?

No!

yep