Implicating dinosaur → scalie
Link to implication

Reason:

Mystifyingly enough, this does not seem to be implicated.

Yoshi is generally tagged dinosaur, but not scalie. And what about furred/feathered dinosaurs?

Dinosaur and scalie tags aren't ones I'm familiar with, so not really making argument against implication - just pointing out possible considerations based on quick searches.

Nyteshade said:
Yoshi is generally tagged dinosaur, but not scalie. And what about furred/feathered dinosaurs?

Dinosaur and scalie tags aren't ones I'm familiar with, so not really making argument against implication - just pointing out possible considerations based on quick searches.

Well if you look at the Scalie tag there is 'notable exceptions' for dragons, so we can add that to dinosaurs. Which would mean we'd need to add "Feathered_Dinosaur" as a tag.

Jade_Angel said:
Well if you look at the Scalie tag there is 'notable exceptions' for dragons, so we can add that to dinosaurs. Which would mean we'd need to add "Feathered_Dinosaur" as a tag.

Dragon once implied scalie, but that is no longer true.

Scalie is the furry term for all types of dinosaurs, dragons, etc. Including ones that don't actually have scales (see http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Scalie ). It's well established, so even if we try to define it in some other way here, I expect that it'll keep getting tagged for those.

Some time ago i made an thread to get this implication deleted because feathered dinosaurs are a thing

Based on forum #140565 I'm going to go ahead and deny this.