Implicating mega_scizor → scizor
Link to implication

Reason:

Noticed this when I uploaded this image today.

post #799704

Also, Mega_banette should be implied to Banette, after I noticed it needed the implication after uploading this image.

#799714

Some mega evolutions were tagged like this at one point, but those implications were deleted and now they are treated as separate species for tagging purposes.

Denied

parasprite said:
Some mega evolutions were tagged like this at one point, but those implications were deleted and now they are treated as separate species for tagging purposes.

Denied

Huh. When did that happen?

GameManiac said:
Huh. When did that happen?

I know it was discussed on the forums several times before, but it was actually put through in forum #154877.

parasprite said:
I know it was discussed on the forums several times before, but it was actually put through in forum #154877.

Hmm... No wonder you're hesitant about color implications regarding Monster Hunter monsters. Now I understand why.

GameManiac said:
Hmm... No wonder you're hesitant about color implications regarding Monster Hunter monsters. Now I understand why.

Yeah, it's why I'm supporting alternate color instead.