Implicating angry_sex → angry
Link to implication

Reason:

Is angry_sex even worth having at this point? They may just be making the face from the intensity of the sexual activity.

There's also less than 140 tags for it.

GameManiac said:
Is angry_sex even worth having at this point? They may just be making the face from the intensity of the sexual activity.

If that's what it looks like (intense instead of angry), the post shouldn't be tagged as angry sex. But the tag itself should be kept, it's such a common kink that I expect a lot of users to search for it.

GameManiac said:
Is angry_sex even worth having at this point? They may just be making the face from the intensity of the sexual activity.

There's also less than 140 tags for it.

we do have happy_sex

Genjar said:
If that's what it looks like (intense instead of angry), the post shouldn't be tagged as angry sex. But the tag itself should be kept, it's such a common kink that I expect a lot of users to search for it.

mrnotsosafeforwork said:
we do have happy_sex

Alright then. I stand corrected.

We don't have sad_sex. That makes me sad.

I guess it's just a case of words.
Angry_face_sex would just sound silly.

Happy sex and angry sex. The cosmos is balanced.

Clenched teeth is also common with angry sex.

leomole said:
We don't have sad_sex. That makes me sad.

Hehe :-D

HotUnderTheCollar said:
Clenched teeth is also common with angry sex.

I added that to the wiki.