Implicating pete's_dragon_(film) → disney
Link to implication

Reason:

It's a disney film, since zootopia implies it, I don't see why pete's_dragon_(film) shouldn't.

EDIT: The tag implication pete's_dragon_(film) -> disney (forum #204419) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

Chaser said:
Implicating pete's_dragon_(film) → disney
Link to implication

Reason:

It's a disney film, since zootopia implies it, I don't see why pete's_dragon_(film) shouldn't.

Should probably differentiate between the 1980s and 2016 version as the dragons do have clearly different physical forms from each other and plot isnt quite the same. Other then that all is fine.

Ruku said:
Should probably differentiate between the 1980s and 2016 version as the dragons do have clearly different physical forms from each other and plot isnt quite the same. Other then that all is fine.

Wikipedia has pete's_dragon_(film) for the original 1977 film, and Pete's_Dragon_(2016_film) for the new one. Not sure if e621 follows the same titling rule as wikipedia though. If so, Pete's_Dragon_(2016_film) should also imply disney.

Chaser said:
Wikipedia has pete's_dragon_(film) for the original 1977 film, and Pete's_Dragon_(2016_film) for the new one. Not sure if e621 follows the same titling rule as wikipedia though. If so, Pete's_Dragon_(2016_film) should also imply disney.

well based off thundercats_2011 being implicated to thundercats(original series) it would seem that way

The tag implication pete's_dragon_(film) -> disney (forum #204419) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

Both versions of the tag mentioned here are empty. The only tags I see are these two:

pete's_dragon
pete's_dragon_(2016)

I'm not familiar enough with the franchise or these two tags to know if the above logic still applies to these versions of the tag. If someone wants to doublecheck that and make a bur for those two if the details check out, then that would be fine.