I believe that we should use a correct terminology with the tagging system. But today I've come across two misnamed tags: the cone of shame and the elizabethan collar

In fact, the real name of the "cone of shame" is the elizabethan collar and the real name of the "elizabethan collar" is the ruff

My suggestion is to alias cone_of_shame to elizabethan_collar and then manually correct the other thing to ruff_(clothing) [there is also a bird specie that use that name too]

Zenti said:
I believe that we should use a correct terminology with the tagging system. But today I've come across two misnamed tags: the cone of shame and the elizabethan collar

examples here

post #187405
post #134832

In fact, the real name of the "cone of shame" is the elizabethan collar and the real name of the "elizabethan collar" is the ruff

sources here

elizabethan collar:

• wikipedian sources: here and here
• non wikipedian sources: here and here

ruff:

• wikipedian sources: here and here
• non wikipedian sources: here and here

My suggestion is to alias cone_of_shame to elizabethan_collar and then manually correct the other thing to ruff_(clothing) [there is also a bird specie that use that name too]

Probably best to alias the Elizabethan collar first, then remove the alias and alias over the Cone of Shame, that way they don't get mixed up.

The day that there will be a hot_under_the_collar tag...

Also, bell collar is used too, but already fixed a while ago.

-1. A ruff and a cone of shame are clearly two different things. One is for fashion and the other is for keeping animals from scratching themselves.

leomole said:
-1. A ruff and a cone of shame are clearly two different things. One is for fashion and the other is for keeping animals from scratching themselves.

That's exactly the point. OP is trying to get the tags to go to the correct places.

Furrin_Gok said:
That's exactly the point. OP is trying to get the tags to go to the correct places.

Sorry, I misunderstood. Carry on then.