So I just realized both canine_dildo (136 posts) & knotted_dildo (446 posts) exist. Obviously you could have a dildo with a knot that isn't otherwise canine-looking, but I would tend to think canine_dildo is being undertagged.

The confusing part is that if you can only see the base of the dildo, you can really only be sure it's a knotted_dildo even though canine_dildos are (maybe?) more common than, say, a gryphon or dragon or something that just happens to have a knot.

But on the other hand there's no tag for images like post #949036, where there's definitely a medial_ring, but who knows, maybe it's not an equine_dildo at all??? I don't object to tagging those images with equine_dildo, but then should images like post #945999 be tagged with canine_dildo? Is it alright to assume it's canine when you can't see the whole thing? I'd think people would be more likely to search for canine_dildo than for knotted_dildo if they want to see images like #945999, at least if canine_dildo were tagged as often as it could be. But in the strictest interpretation of Tag What You See, it shouldn't have the canine_dildo tag.

There is currently nothing (AFAIK) stopping you from tagging a dildo with either knot or medial_ring. Of course this has the same issues as any other pure object description tag, i.e. you do not know which object it refers to.

If you ask me you should tag what you see, hence a knot is not necessarily a canine_penis/canine_dildo, a medial_ring is not necessarily an equine_penis/equine_dildo. However if this turns out to be the preferred way to solve this problem I won't argue too much.

?

considering how variable genitalia can be even in the same species its probably be better to tag by the characteristics of the penis or dildo, not by species similarities , especially knots sence furries tend to put them on pretty much anything lol >_>

titanmelon said:
anatomically_correct_dildo ?

  :v  

No

It can't be anatomically_correct if you cannot define which genitalia is even supposed to be correct in the first place.

Maybe, just maybe, we could imply canine_dildo to knotted_dildo, that way people might find knotted_dildo easier. However I don't think there's much we can do about equine_dildo.