Aliasing moist → wet
Link to alias

Reason:

One is clearly more popular than the other, and both roughly describe the same physical act.

GameManiac said:
One is clearly more popular than the other, and both roughly describe the same physical act.

Incorrect. Moist is used to describe when a vagina is wet with anticipation and such, but wet is any wetness.

Furrin_Gok said:
Incorrect. Moist is used to describe when a vagina is wet with anticipation and such, but wet is any wetness.

It's still a rather limited tag though. Although glancing over it tells me that it needs a bit of cleaning up first.

GameManiac said:
It's still a rather limited tag though. Although glancing over it tells me that it needs a bit of cleaning up first.

I would rather perform a cleanup than get rid of a useful tag. Once it's cleaned though, it should probably be aliased to something more intuitive, like moist_pussy or something. Why that doesn't exist yet is beyond me.

Furrin_Gok said:
I would rather perform a cleanup than get rid of a useful tag. Once it's cleaned though, it should probably be aliased to something more intuitive, like moist_pussy or something. Why that doesn't exist yet is beyond me.

Brcause then it would quickly be aliased to pussy_juice, as is the tag used on e621 to highlight vaginal fluids/secretions.

Furrin_Gok said:
I would rather perform a cleanup than get rid of a useful tag. Once it's cleaned though, it should probably be aliased to something more intuitive, like moist_pussy or something. Why that doesn't exist yet is beyond me.

Wet_pussy.

And underwear is covered by wet_panties, etc. I don't see any need for moist.

Even wet by itself is kind of useless. Since it covers anything from wet pussies to underwater scenes. Not sure why anyone would search for that. If I had time, I'd go through it and tag the posts with the appropriate subtags (wet_pussy, wet_fur, etc), but with 9000+ posts... nah.

Genjar said:
Wet_pussy.

And underwear is covered by wet_panties, etc. I don't see any need for moist.

Even wet by itself is kind of useless. Since it covers anything from wet pussies to underwater scenes. Not sure why anyone would search for that. If I had time, I'd go through it and tag the posts with the appropriate subtags (wet_pussy, wet_fur, etc), but with 9000+ posts... nah.

Why doesn't wet_pussy imply pussy_juice? Is it possible to tag the first without the second?

Genjar said:
Wet_pussy.

And underwear is covered by wet_panties, etc. I don't see any need for moist.

Even wet by itself is kind of useless. Since it covers anything from wet pussies to underwater scenes. Not sure why anyone would search for that. If I had time, I'd go through it and tag the posts with the appropriate subtags (wet_pussy, wet_fur, etc), but with 9000+ posts... nah.

Okay, even if it's empty, moist_pussy should imply that just so that we don't get confused and think it's a missing tag.

Moist is a gross word.

Approved to keep the generic "has fluid on/in it" tags in one place until we can figure out what to do with them.