Topic: Movie question

Posted under Off Topic

This topic has been locked.

Do any of you know of any movies That were done in the late 80's and the 90's that had dragons in them?
I love fantasy movies and I can never find good ones any more.

List of movies that I am aware of from that time

1. Dungeons and Dragons
2. DragonHeart
3. Hobbit (Animated)
4. LordofTheRings (Animated)

Updated by Millcore

Almaren said:
THANK YOU I forgot about this movie!!!! Love it i do LOVE

heehee :D I aim to please :D

Updated by anonymous

Puff the Magic Dragon. Cartoon from 1978, but still worth watching.

Updated by anonymous

The PageMaster, Godzilla VS King Ghidorah, I think Reign Of Fire was released in late 90s or early 2000s.

Updated by anonymous

I highly recommend Dragonslayer, circa 1981. Pretty good wizards and dragons flick, holds up even today with the special effects from ILM.

Updated by anonymous

The bulk update request #2098 has been rejected.

remove alias 2girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias 3girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias multiple_girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias 2boys (0) -> male (2319957)
remove alias 3boys (0) -> male (2319957)
remove alias multiple_boys (0) -> male (2319957)

Reason: im sorry. i realized too late that unaliasing works through this page and i already submitted a vague alias request. Reason: we can't search for artwork where there are a specific ammount of characters. tags such as 2girls, multiple girls, 3girls,(or boys) are aliased with female wich doesn't work. when i am looking for artwork with 2girls it shows me every post tagged with female which is a lot. the tag 2girls is useless now. theres a difference between the presence of a characters type in general and the ammount of characters. sometimes i want to make sure that in the search there are two girls or boys because thats what we like together with other tags. i dont want to go through every female tagged post to find 2girls. we can see who is in the picture in the thumbnail but that's tedious and takes way too long since female/male is a broad tag becasue literally every post is tagged with sex.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2098 (forum #328592) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

trap2222 said:
The bulk update request #2098 has been rejected.

remove alias 2girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias 3girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias multiple_girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias 2boys (0) -> male (2319957)
remove alias 3boys (0) -> male (2319957)
remove alias multiple_boys (0) -> male (2319957)

Reason: im sorry. i realized too late that unaliasing works through this page and i already submitted a vague alias request. Reason: we can't search for artwork where there are a specific ammount of characters. tags such as 2girls, multiple girls, 3girls,(or boys) are aliased with female wich doesn't work. when i am looking for artwork with 2girls it shows me every post tagged with female which is a lot. the tag 2girls is useless now. theres a difference between the presence of a characters type in general and the ammount of characters. sometimes i want to make sure that in the search there are two girls or boys because thats what we like together with other tags. i dont want to go through every female tagged post to find 2girls. we can see who is in the picture in the thumbnail but that's tedious and takes way too long since female/male is a broad tag becasue literally every post is tagged with sex.

kind of buried this in an unrelated thread.

trap2222 said:
The bulk update request #2098 has been rejected.

remove alias 2girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias 3girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias multiple_girls (0) -> female (2395312)
remove alias 2boys (0) -> male (2319957)
remove alias 3boys (0) -> male (2319957)
remove alias multiple_boys (0) -> male (2319957)

Reason: im sorry. i realized too late that unaliasing works through this page and i already submitted a vague alias request. Reason: we can't search for artwork where there are a specific ammount of characters. tags such as 2girls, multiple girls, 3girls,(or boys) are aliased with female wich doesn't work. when i am looking for artwork with 2girls it shows me every post tagged with female which is a lot. the tag 2girls is useless now. theres a difference between the presence of a characters type in general and the ammount of characters. sometimes i want to make sure that in the search there are two girls or boys because thats what we like together with other tags. i dont want to go through every female tagged post to find 2girls. we can see who is in the picture in the thumbnail but that's tedious and takes way too long since female/male is a broad tag becasue literally every post is tagged with sex.

what

furrin_gok said:
kind of buried this in an unrelated thread.

It's possible they intended it for a different thread, but left out a number by accident.

hey so i don't know how this site works yet i just wanted to unalias the 2girls tag and i couldn't submit it without a topic number and dont know what that means. there is no list of which number is assigned to which topic i have no idea what that even is i just wanted to submit a tag request. help please

trap2222 said:
hey so i don't know how this site works yet i just wanted to unalias the 2girls tag and i couldn't submit it without a topic number and dont know what that means. there is no list of which number is assigned to which topic i have no idea what that even is i just wanted to submit a tag request. help please

You can submit a BUR without adding a topic number, it will just create a brand new thread instead.
Inserting a topic number means that you want to link a BUR to an existing thread, like what you have did here.
You can find out a topic thread's number by looking at the ID number in the page's link; e.g., for this thread it was topic #12.

There is currently no way (that I know of) to move an existing BUR to a separate thread, so don't bother hiding the BUR comment (as it will not remove the BUR itself from the system).
You can probably reject it yourself by going through here - BUR #2098 - and then recreating it again without a topic number, but judging by the looks of the current votes, it might get shot down rather quickly again.

  • 1