Implicating imminent_incest → incest
Link to implication

Reason:

I feel like this would be better as an alias cuz I don't see the point but ayyyy I figured I'd do this to be safe.

People are ruining my blacklist with tags like this. ;-;

EDIT: The tag implication imminent_incest -> incest_(lore) (forum #184637) has been rejected by @Millcore.

blacklist both? :v

imminent_rape is not implicated to rape and imminent_sex is not implicated to sex.

Maxpizzle said:
imminent_rape is not implicated to rape and imminent_sex is not implicated to sex.

is not implicated to Sex, while Rape is and sex already is sex. It simply refers to the act of romantic/intimate relations between family members. I'd say +1 for alias.

Aliasing to implied_incest might be a better option. That would be a decent umbrella term to cover all situations where the incest act is not actually pictured, but is about to happen, has already happened, or has text indicating intentions/desires between the characters.

Whether or not you would want to then implicate THAT tag to incest is up for debate though. From a strict tagging standpoint, it's not technically actually incest until it physically happens. From a usability standpoint, I think most people who are searching for the incest tag would also want to see all implied_incest pictures, and those blacklisting it probably wouldn't want to see either of the tags... but again you could just search/blacklist both.

Crispix said:
Aliasing to implied_incest might be a better option. That would be a decent umbrella term to cover all situations where the incest act is not actually pictured, but is about to happen, has already happened, or has text indicating intentions/desires between the characters.

+1 to this.

The tag implication imminent_incest -> incest_(lore) (forum #184637) has been rejected by @Millcore.