I've just changed covering and 2 implicated tags' wikis to match the implications. I'm not sure if this is perfect but I think it's better than previous version.

Two things I'm not sure:

1.
I've changed "naked character" to just "character". I think that these tags make sense also in topless, bottomless, and other partially clothed characters.

2.
I've changed "genitalia" to "genitalia or breasts" because otherwise one of implications don't make sense. Still should covering tag be limited just to those two, or should it be more broad?

That's definitely better than the previous version, which isn't surprising since it was last edited 3 years ago, possibly when the tag was still new (I have no idea).

1. You're never sure if the character is going to be completely naked. No need to add the word, no need to keep it. At the most I'd go with "implying nudity" since this is a common joke in cartoons/comics whether they are nude or not. It should be noted that sometimes a character can cover themselves because they are embarrased of crossdressing, so nudity is definitely not required.
2. Theres a mix of choices in *cover* that should probably be cleaned up somehow. I'm not familiar enough with these tags to know if there are any similar tags which already cover them (covering_own_mouth -> hands_over_mouth or something similar).