How to tag... this:
post #764475

Is it selfcest? Is it autofellatio? is it solo? is it duo? Is it gay? is it multi_head? asdfghjk I can't even.

o_O i...i don't know. also, that is an old cartoon.

I...would probably go with tagging that as: multi_head, conjoined, pushmi-pullyu, hybrid (because each head of a single body seems to be a different species). And then because they seem to be treated as a single character, I'd probably go with solo (because it's all one creature), masturbation, autofellatio, etc. But conjoined is tricky and could probably be legitimately tagged as duo, fellatio, etc sometimes and I don't think we have a clearcut answer for that.

It doesn't help that depending on how it's drawn, multi_heads and conjoined can both seem to have more than one personality OR seem to be all part of one single entity depending on the image and context. And that range of variation really makes having any clear "always tag those this way" rule of thumb difficult for those cases. So right now it mainly boils down to what people think makes the most sense in that image on a case by case basis. (For better or worse.)

In any case I wouldn't go with selfcest on this one (though it did cross my mind for a second). But the reason is because I think selfcest takes two separate bodies that are functionally different copies of the same person (clones or alternate versions) having sex. So it's literally having sex with another version of you that's separate in some way from you = selfcest. In this image it's using one head to suck shared genitals so I think it'd be mostly masturbation of a single conjoined creature with multiple heads.

I'd tag it as multi_head solo, with autofellatio.

Selfcest is also implicated to square_crossover, which doesn't fit that. ^{_{(I'm still not sure what that tag name even means. It doesn't seem to be used anywhere else but here.)}}

I'd tag it with anything that would apply to both two separate characters and one conjoined entity.

In the cartoon show, they're treated as separate, sibling characters, Cat and Dog. So I'd also tag incest and such.

I'd also try tagging for the sake of users who have never seen the cartoon. So, rather than make the choice between separate characters/one character, I'd tag inclusively rather than exclusively.

So I'd use both fellatio and autofellatio, sex and masturbation, so on and so forth.

Selfcest wouldn't apply here, for reasons explained before my post.

Other than tagging the position and uncommon anatomy, it seems straightforward.

Knotty_Curls said:
I'd tag it with anything that would apply to both two separate characters and one conjoined entity.

In the cartoon show, they're treated as separate, sibling characters, Cat and Dog. So I'd also tag incest and such.

I'd also try tagging for the sake of users who have never seen the cartoon. So, rather than make the choice between separate characters/one character, I'd tag inclusively rather than exclusively.

So I'd use both fellatio and autofellatio, sex and masturbation, so on and so forth.

Selfcest wouldn't apply here, for reasons explained before my post.

Other than tagging the position and uncommon anatomy, it seems straightforward.

I really do think we're putting way too much thought into this

There is a lot of thought having to go into tagging CatDog as an entity, not to mention other biologically-siamese/conjoined characters.

Might a new set of tags be appropriate for this? Something like conjoincest, for when conjoined characters engage in sexual activities with themselves and each other? This probably would need to have a chart to determine what is conjoincest and what is normal masturbation.

Are characters neurally connected to each other? I.E., do the characters have a shared spinal cord?

• Yes
• Tag with conjoincest
• No
• Do the characters share genitalia that is being stimulated (anus, vagina, penis, nipples, etc.)?
• Yes
• Tag with conjoincest
• No
• Is either character interacting with the other's genitalia or engaging in sexual activities with the other character, e.g. kissing, groping, nipple pinching, etc.?
• Yes
• Tag with conjoincest
• No
• Tag with masturbation and appropriate tags (This case will probably be rare, and we may want to make the tag conjoined_masturbation or something)

Things get sticky with conjoined characters, so we may need conjoined_characters to add to it all. Thus with all of that said, I vote to use conjoin and conjoined in tags to denote the presence of conjoined characters.