While helping out with tags in some of the more unusual posts, I noticed that these two tags were being used interchangeably. We should alias one to the other, but I'm not sure which.

Afterglow said:
While helping out with tags in some of the more unusual posts, I noticed that these two tags were being used interchangeably. We should alias one to the other, but I'm not sure which.

Well, ~living_dildo ~living_insertion -vore pulls up 12 results, which definitely shows there is some overlap/confusion. Both probably overlap with sex_toy_transformation in purpose, but things like post #65991 are definitely not vore or transformation-related.

I think that going with living_dildo would help clarify usage while reducing confusion with vore. It could also easily fit in with sex_toy_transformation that way.

parasprite said:
I think that going with living_dildo would help clarify usage while reducing confusion with vore. It could also easily fit in with sex_toy_transformation that way.

I'd give in some leeway given the body shape of a metapod and tag that as tail sex myself.

A good deal of it involves eels and snakes. Which doesn't really line up with using someone as a sex toy. Unless you count an eel as a "someone" I suppose.

Afterglow said:
A good deal of it involves eels and snakes. Which doesn't really line up with using someone as a sex toy. Unless you count an eel as a "someone" I suppose.

It is technically considered a character, and would probably fall under that usage tagging-wise. Having a separate tag for animals that are already pretty much "sex toy shaped" would be kind of pointless tbh.

parasprite said:
~living_dildo ~living_insertion -vore

I've just noticed you can use "~" in tag searchs \o/