I'm having a hard time finding porn featuring an anthro and a feral creature of the same species.

This is because anthro_on_feral is implicated to bestiality, which is implicated to interspecies.

Not all anthro_on_feral pairings are necessarily of an interspecies nature.

Wanting to find more like post #178538 or post #381742, but 'anthro_on_feral -interspecies' yields no results due to the implication with bestiality and interspecies.

Just a minor complaint. Maybe others have the same issue. idunno, just throwing my two cents out there.

EDIT: Cool beans, thanks.

bestiality -> interspecies deleted
human_on_feral -> interspecies approved

https://e621.net/forum/show/174768

I believe the implication was originally made under the assumption that it would only be used for human/feral pairings, which is no longer the case. Knowing that, I think it would be simplest to just remove the bestiality -> interspecies implications and instead make human_on_anthro, etc. -> interspecies implications instead.

parasprite said:
I believe the implication was originally made under the assumption that it would only be used for human/feral pairings, which is no longer the case. Knowing that, I think it would be simplest to just remove the bestiality -> interspecies implications and instead make human_on_anthro, etc. -> interspecies implications instead.

+1 to that.

parasprite said:
I believe the implication was originally made under the assumption that it would only be used for human/feral pairings, which is no longer the case. Knowing that, I think it would be simplest to just remove the bestiality -> interspecies implications and instead make human_on_anthro, etc. -> interspecies implications instead.

This sounds good to me, too. Just make sure that anthro_on_feral doesn't implicate to interspecies as well.