This tag seems to be unecessary. Pictures tagged with it either have genitalia that's appropriate for the character or should just be tagged hyper. Can I get a second opinion?

It looks more like it doubles for plump_labia, but seeing as...

• It seems to only be tagged by ~2 people, all happening a couple years ago.
• It doesn't already imply pussy.
• ~40 posts
• The pussy stretches quite a bit so proportions may be a little wonky.
• See also: childbirth
• See also: equines, other species
• See also: perspective/nezumi
• hyper_pussy is barely used.

I don't think we really need it tbh. I would be fine with a big_pussy tag if we could define and tag some of them, but I'm not sure anybody really cares enough to make a distinction unless it's abnormally huge (i.e., hyper). At least I would think if anybody did care we would have had a tag already. That's just my thoughts anyways.

Also, whatever happens to this, we should do with huge_vagina since that's obviously a dupe tag.

I think having tags like plump_labia and gaping_pussy are good enough. huge_pussy just seems silly.