Topic: Tag Alias: good_boy -> pet_praise

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

consider good_boy & good_girl specify gender, pet_praise doesn't.... whatever

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Eurgh-xan said:
Why pet praise?

same, former is just a specification on gender of the latter.

-1 thru for a alias, instead this should be implicated if anything.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

+1 for both aliases.
Overuse of gender-specific tags should be avoided, especially for minor tags such as this one.

(Could pet_praise possibly be implicated to either dominant or submissive? Edit: ...submissive is clearly out, now that I got a moment to think about it.)

Updated by anonymous

Before anyone thinks so, I'm not for nor against this (yet), I am literally asking why pet_praise? It feels like an odd tag to type in, could there be a better name?

Updated by anonymous

ZaSigma4 said:
consider good_boy & good_girl specify gender, pet_praise doesn't.... whatever

Ruku said:
same, former is just a specification on gender of the latter.

-1 thru for a alias, instead this should be implicated if anything.

Let's have all the tags good_boy, good_girl, good_ambiguous_gender, good_herm, good_dickgirl, good_cuntboy, good_maleherm, good_intersex, good_pet, good_dog, good_puppy and good_kitten because pet_praise isn't specific enough

+1 for an alias

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Eurgh-xan said:
Before anyone thinks so, I'm not for nor against this (yet), I am literally asking why pet_praise? It feels like an odd tag to type in, could there be a better name?

That tag already existed and I believe it describes itself pretty well, so I left it as it is.

Do you have any suggestions for a better name? I think it at least needs to contain the word "praise/praising".

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

The name seems good enough, since it is consistent with petplay.

Come to think about it, there's some overlap. Could pet_praise be considered to be a form of petplay? If so, maybe an implication...?

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
(Could pet_praise possibly be implicated to either dominant or submissive?)

Take these Wolfy-Nail pieces, for example. There may be an underlying tone of domination in the words (and perhaps a "You're mine, bitch" look on the speaker's face), but I'm unsure if it's appropiate to implement said tags when there are no other explicit signs of domination present in the posts; like arm_grab or head_grab (the post to the left looks more like hand_on_head rather than head_grab).

post #223388 post #183781

Genjar said:
Come to think about it, there's some overlap. Could pet_praise be considered to be a form of petplay? If so, maybe an implication...?

Nah, it appears like it doesn't always have to be used in petplay situations.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1