Implicating orgy -> group.

Reason: Orgy implies, by its definition, at least 5 characters. Group is pic with 3 characters or more on it. Therefore 5 >= 3 therefore orgy => group
Same goes for foursome, group_sex, threesome, and gangbang.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
*I don't know if I should make another topic for this, but is trio a valid tag? If it is, then definition of group should have been changed to 4+ instead of 3+. If not then threesome, and gangbang also imply group.

I'm a firm believer in the Primitive Peoples school of thought when it comes to numerical tags for groups of people. In my personal opinion, the '1, 2, many' (solo, duo/couple, group) form of counting individuals in a given image is the best and easiest way to quantify it.

Digital_Kindness said:
I'm a firm believer in the Primitive Peoples school of thought when it comes to numerical tags for groups of people. In my personal opinion, the '1, 2, many' (solo, duo/couple, group) form of counting individuals in a given image is the best and easiest way to quantify it.

Actually it is my mistake, and I'm editing first post now. Trio is aliased to group, only in alias page there was written trio (1127), not trio (0) so I thought that alias didn't passed after all.
So if trio is aliased, then threesome and gangbang should also imply group.