Implicating 5_fingers → fingers
Link to implication

Reason:

2_fingers, 3_fingers, and 4_fingers should be implicated to fingers as well. Numbers other than these four are currently quite rare.

hmmm...alias instead perhaps? i mean, regardless of the number, fingers are fingers. your avatar pic for example: why have both 5_fingers + fingers tags when just fingers alone would suffice?

likewise with toes and any other digits.

treos said:
hmmm...alias instead perhaps? i mean, regardless of the number, fingers are fingers. your avatar pic for example: why have both 5_fingers + fingers tags when just fingers alone would suffice?

likewise with toes and any other digits.

Because not all characters have the standard 5 digits. Honestly fingers should be invalidated as we have done with other generic non-specific body tags like arm and head...

Ruku said:
Honestly fingers should be invalidated as we have done with other generic non-specific body tags like arm and head...

I like that option too. While more characters lack fingers (MLP and some other ferals come to mind) than arms and heads, the fingers tag is fairly uncommon and has little practical use. If we do decide to keep the tag, though, then the implications would be a logical step.

This has come up a few times, but with no clear consensus.

For now, it'd probably be best to focus on adding tags such as humanoid_hands, and non-standard finger counts. Instead of tagging 5_fingers or fingers.