I have the vore tag blacklisted due to not being a fan of seeing characters eaten. Even soft vore is offputting for me, but seeing a venus fly trap or a pitcher plant eating insects just seems cool, like the way a spider is naturally going to catch flies and moths and other flying pests and eat them.
post #27675 this, for example, got blacklisted, but I don't want it to be. Is there a tag for scenarios like this that I can exclude from my vore blacklist, or am I just going to have to risk the occasional character vore by excluding fly traps in general?

It's a tricky one, but how about adding:

• vore rating:q
• vore rating:e

If you want to see posts where the vore itself isn't really playing a role, like in the thumb you provided, this would work pretty well.

What exactly do you not want to see? Anything involving non-feral, non-insect + real plant 'vore'?

titanmelon said:
What exactly do you not want to see? Anything involving non-feral, non-insect + real plant 'vore'?

Well, I don't mind seeing feral insects getting eaten by a spider, either. It's basically like HUTC said, I don't like it when vore is a major role of the image.

Forgot to reply to this, whoops

(theoretically identical to [vore rating:q] + [vore rating:e])

Still brings up posts like post #516951 and post #731859

So I'm not too sure if that would be an option
--

There's probably a workaround for this involving very complicated combinations of blacklist entries, and assumptions of thorough fetish tagging,

But in cases like these I think a dedicated tag would be more efficient in the long run

could work, but that still leaves soft vore

?

titanmelon said:
Forgot to reply to this, whoops

[vore -rating:s]

(theoretically identical to [vore rating:q] + [vore rating:e])

Still brings up posts like post #516951 and post #731859

So I'm not too sure if that would be an option
--

There's probably a workaround for this involving very complicated combinations of blacklist entries, and assumptions of thorough fetish tagging,

But in cases like these I think a dedicated tag would be more efficient in the long run

non_explicit_vore

could work, but that still leaves soft vore

non_fetish_vore

?

I'm personally fine with soft vore, but perhaps realistic_vore for when it's just something consuming a smaller something that could reasonably be swallowed. vore -realistic_vore and realistic_vore xray would be viable for the blacklist then.

titanmelon said:
But in cases like these I think a dedicated tag would be more efficient in the long run

non_explicit_vore

could work, but that still leaves soft vore

non_fetish_vore

?

Furrin_Gok said:
I'm personally fine with soft vore, but perhaps realistic_vore for when it's just something consuming a smaller something that could reasonably be swallowed. vore -realistic_vore and realistic_vore xray would be viable for the blacklist then.

Not bashing the idea of a new tag, just the name, realistic/natural/etc is not a very good description, as a lion chomping down on a Thomson gazelle with blood and entrails and whatnot could definitely be considered that. However I guess you could kind of use it as soft_vore realistic_vore, but a dedicated name would be better.

non_explicit_vore doesn't really work too good either, it's too similar to simply vore -rating:e -gore or similar, non_fetish_vore is maybe the best name-wise so far.

Does a carnivorous plant just doing its carnivorous-plant thing even count as vore? The wiki kind of makes it sound like it does, but maybe the wiki should be changed. I don't personally think of absolutely anything ingesting absolutely anything else as vore, but then again I'm not a scholar of vore.