Implicating company/ies_copyright_tag/s → spyro_the_dragon
Link to implication

Reason:

Spyro was originally owned by Universal Studios...I think, but then got bought by Atari, then after that got bought by whoever makes Skylanders.

Should the current Company who owns him go under the copyright column, or who? Because to me currently having only "Spyro_The_Dragon there isn't enough.

Bj007pro said:
Implicating company/ies_copyright_tag/s → spyro_the_dragon

The current publisher is Activision but the original developer was Insomniac Games. There is no current developer, which is kind of strange?

Furrin_Gok said:
You want to have the game first, the company second. Spyro should imply the company.
The current publisher is Activision but the original developer was Insomniac Games. There is no current developer, which is kind of strange?

The current developer is whoever makes Skylanders.

Bj007pro said:
The current developer is whoever makes Skylanders.

The Skylanders page is written a bit differently, but it looks like their current developer is Beenox. The group that focused on Spyro, though, would be Toys for Bob, a subsidiary of Activision.

Furrin_Gok said:
The Skylanders page is written a bit differently, but it looks like their current developer is Beenox. The group that focused on Spyro, though, would be Toys for Bob, a subsidiary of Activision.

What do you mean their page is written a bit differently, Wikipedia Pages are always written the same way. - Where are you getting your information from?

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylanders

I don't understand why we have to tag whatever company owns Spyro, especially since the franchise seems to change hands so often.

Bj007pro said:
What do you mean their page is written a bit differently, Wikipedia Pages are always written the same way. - Where are you getting your information from?

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylanders

I'm saying Skylanders didn't have a "To Present" or "-Present" bit on theirs like Spyro did.

Knotty_Curls said:
I don't understand why we have to tag whatever company owns Spyro, especially since the franchise seems to change hands so often.

Furrin_Gok said:
I'm saying Skylanders didn't have a "To Present" or "-Present" bit on theirs like Spyro did.

Why not put the Publisher Activision then, since they've been with Spyro since the beginning?

Denied because we really don't care about what company owns Spyro. Company tags are generally only used for when the company has a lot of brand exposure as a franchise in and of itself, like nintendo, disney, and marvel.

Noti how marvel doesn't imply disney. Even though it's technically correct the two things don't have anything to do with each other so we intentionally left it off for tagging purposes.

Also, as a general rule I usually avoid implying bigger tags to smaller tags. If you are suggesting one of these, chances are you are doing something wrong.

parasprite said:
Also, as a general rule I usually avoid implying bigger tags to smaller tags. If you are suggesting one of these, chances are you are doing something wrong.

And what is that "thing" I'm doing wrong?

Bj007pro said:
And what is that "thing" I'm doing wrong?

Company -> Game is the wrong order, it's Game -> Company