Implicating wet_fur → wet
Link to implication

Reason:

can't tag wet_fur unless someone is wet

Just stumbled across this tag again and thought "Huh. No way this hasn't been implicated yet."

so I searched here and surprise surprise, I suggested it before. I must have been drunk

Knotty_Curls said:
Implicating wet_fur → wet
Link to implication

Reason:

can't tag wet_fur unless someone is wet

Knotty_Curls said:
Just stumbled across this tag again and thought "Huh. No way this hasn't been implicated yet."

so I searched here and surprise surprise, I suggested it before. I must have been drunk

Even so, wet_fur should stay. Because what happens if the character is a lizard or a human? They don't have fur or hair now do they?

Bj007pro said:
Even so, wet_fur should stay. Because what happens if the character is a lizard or a human? They don't have fur or hair now do they?

Please familiarize yourself with the lingo used for aliases and implications.

Alias: Aliasing Tag_X → Tag_Y means replace Tag_X with Tag_Y
For example cock aliased to (→) penis means that all instances of "cock" are replaced with "penis"

Implication: Implicating Tag_X → Tag_Y means whenever Tag_X is added also add Tag_Y
For example wet_fur implicated to (→) wet means that whenever "wet_fur" is tagged "wet" will also be tagged.

Also, approved.

Bj007pro said:
Even so, wet_fur should stay. Because what happens if the character is a lizard or a human? They don't have fur or hair now do they?

Implication, buddy. Means it will stay; alias is when it gets replaced.