Topic: Tag Implication: thigh_grab -> hand_on_thigh

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

titanmelon

Former Staff

In some cases we consider stuff like paws/claws/appendages to be 'hands'

especially for implications like those stated in Reason
-
There was also that hoofjob/pawjob/rear_pawjob thing a while ago

IMO, those should be kept

hands are not hooves, and neither are paws/hands
--

What we should have though, is an umbrella tag for all these

  • [umbrella tag]
    • [hooves]
    • [[paws]
    • [[talons]
    • [other appendages etc]

--

appendage_*

?

Updated by anonymous

Chessax

Privileged

titanmelon said:
There was also that hoofjob/pawjob/rear_pawjob thing a while ago

IMO, those should be kept

hoofjob? Sure.
pawjob? No thanks, disambiguate instead of alias to handjob? Sure.
rear_pawjob? Unsure, feel like footjob in combination with hindpaw is probably good enough.

titanmelon said:
What we should have though, is an umbrella tag for all these

  • [umbrella tag]
    • [hooves]
    • [[paws]
    • [[talons]
    • [other appendages etc]

--

appendage_*

?

This feels like it would become an all post encompassing tag, what would be the purpose of this? Why do we need a tag for appendages?

Updated by anonymous

bitWolfy

Former Staff

Sure, but corresponding implications already exist for breast_grab and butt_grab.
https://e621.net/forum_topics/11933
https://e621.net/forum_topics/11963

So we may be splitting hairs here.
Need more concrete data on how often thighs are grabbed with things other than hands.

Also, I hate how ZaSigma4 was just spamming that link in all those threads instead of just articulating the argument.
And the link itself leads to a forum discussion with one random person responding, and that's it.

  • 1