Topic: Tag Implication: holding_character -> carrying

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

If you're holding someone up, it's certainly not mandatory that you are carrying them. You may be dangling or cradling them, or they may be simply lifted.

The tag is clearly misused a whole lot since currently post #908644 is the latest upload to use it, and it's hardly appropriate to say that someone who's siting down is "carrying" someone else!

Updated by anonymous

I wrote it wrong, carrying should imply holding person, while fixing those tags that night, I wrote them in reverse to fix holding_(disambiguation) first, by changing it to holding_person.

So that's a fail for me.

However, I could call that carrying since their weight is being lifted by another person, being propped up against the wall or etc still means they are (mostly) off of a surface. But that image is wrong, during my early tagging I didn't know about chair position . If you can find the rest and apply all the tags I couldn't imagine, then do so, since I didn't know that positions could replace certain carrying tags until recently.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
It should not. Like all 'holding'-tags, holding_character is specifically for posts where a character is being held in someone's hand (or hands).

Like this:
post #553907

so holding_character implies size_difference?

Updated by anonymous

  • 1