Implicating goggles_on_head → goggles
Link to implication

Reason:

If there are goggles on someone's head, then there are certainly goggles in the picture...right?

+1, because THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING BECAUSE THEY'RE ON MY HEAD!

Already suggested at forum #233256.

Siral_Exan said:
[...] THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING BECAUSE THEY'RE ON MY HEAD!

So... where exactly are your eyes then?

O16 said:
So... where exactly are your eyes then?

On his hands.

BlueDingo said:
On his hands.

Don't tell me he also eats fairies and pursues children who steal his food.

Approved.

goggles_on_head and goggles_on_forehead might be worth an alias.

Knotty_Curls said:
Approved.

goggles_on_head and goggles_on_forehead might be worth an alias.

Considering sunglasses_on_forehead is aliased to sunglasses_on_head already, yes, they would.