Implicating nipple_slip → nipples
Link to implication

Reason:

Nipples being partly or completely exposed is explicitly part of the definition of a nipple slip.

It looks like the nipple_slip tag can be used when only the areola is showing, so the implication wouldn't work.

Tuvalu said:
It looks like the nipple_slip tag can be used when only the areola is showing, so the implication wouldn't work.

And we can't imply areola because some characters don't have them...

-1. Nipslip is also used for the areola probably for simplicity.

Tuvalu said:
It looks like the nipple_slip tag can be used when only the areola is showing, so the implication wouldn't work.

leomole said:
-1. Nipslip is also used for the areola probably for simplicity.

Denied for these reasons.

Tuvalu said:
It looks like the nipple_slip tag can be used when only the areola is showing, so the implication wouldn't work.

leomole said:
-1. Nipslip is also used for the areola probably for simplicity.

We actually do have an areola_slip tag but it'd take some time to clean nipple_slip out.

Furrin_Gok said:
We actually do have an areola_slip tag but it'd take some time to clean nipple_slip out.

Not to mention if it can even be kept clean even if we want it to.