I am honestly quite a big fan of this type of fetish, and there seems to be no such tag relating to the fetish, itself. The idea is between either a regular sized creature and a micro, or a regular and a macro size. It is where the smaller creature is shoved into the larger creature's pussy or ass via either a third creature's cock/strap on, or to be shoved in while being on an object resembling a dildo.

That wouldn't be assisted vore, it'd be assisted living insertion.

Hence the quotations around it and the question mark beside it. Though the site definition says vore is "The absorption or insertion of one character into another. While vore usually implies a character eating another character, the tag itself is actually an umbrella term for a series of paraphilias." Includes oral, anal, vaginal, tail, horn, etc.

Just dropping these, maybe not substitutes, but related: tied_to_dildo, inside_dildo, living_dildo.

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
Hence the quotations around it and the question mark beside it. Though the site definition says vore is "The absorption or insertion of one character into another. While vore usually implies a character eating another character, the tag itself is actually an umbrella term for a series of paraphilias." Includes oral, anal, vaginal, tail, horn, etc.

Vore refers to when a character is to be left inside, though, such as unbirthing.

Chessax said:
Just dropping these, maybe not substitutes, but related: tied_to_dildo, inside_dildo, living_dildo.

Those are close, but other than tied_to_dildo, none are close to what I am looking for. living_dildo doesn't imply being on it, more being used as one.

Furrin_Gok said:
Vore refers to when a character is to be left inside, though, such as unbirthing.

It's not necessarily meaning that one indefinitely stays inside the other. It can be for just five minutes.

I could link some specific images that contain the type I am looking to have a tag for.

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
It's not necessarily meaning that one indefinitely stays inside the other. It can be for just five minutes.

I didn't say indefinitely, but if a character is strapped onto a macro penis, they're only going to stay inside as long as the penis does, so it's not really unbirthing or vore at that point.

Those are close, but other than tied_to_dildo, none are close to what I am looking for. living_dildo doesn't imply being on it, more being used as one.

tied_to_penis would certainly be a possible tag.

I could link some specific images that contain the type I am looking to have a tag for.

Go ahead.

This site currently has no way of tagging character interaction, other than a basic sexual, where such interaction is tagged with gender/gender

You're probably looking for micro ~living_insertion ~vaginal_vore ~anal_vore or macro ~living_insertion ~vaginal_vore ~anal_vore. However, due to site's limitations, you cannot satisfy the "assisted" part of your search.

Delian said:
This site currently has no way of tagging character interaction, other than a basic sexual, where such interaction is tagged with gender/gender

You're probably looking for micro ~living_insertion ~vaginal_vore ~anal_vore or macro ~living_insertion ~vaginal_vore ~anal_vore. However, due to site's limitations, you cannot satisfy the "assisted" part of your search.

We do have several position tags that we're starting to use, actually. Adding another one to the list won't hurt.

Furrin_Gok said:
I didn't say indefinitely, but if a character is strapped onto a macro penis, they're only going to stay inside as long as the penis does, so it's not really unbirthing or vore at that point.
tied_to_penis would certainly be a possible tag.

Go ahead.

tied_to_penis is not an existing tag.

Examples:
https://e621.net/post/show/750611/2014-animal_genitalia-animal_penis-anthro-anus-bal

https://e621.net/post/show/793804/anal-anal_penetration-anal_vore-animal_genitalia-a

https://e621.net/post/show/490100/2007-anthro-anus-bent_over-black_fur-black_penis-b

P.S. The title of the tag is more or less just an idea at the moment.

Delian said:
This site currently has no way of tagging character interaction, other than a basic sexual, where such interaction is tagged with gender/gender

You're probably looking for micro ~living_insertion ~vaginal_vore ~anal_vore or macro ~living_insertion ~vaginal_vore ~anal_vore. However, due to site's limitations, you cannot satisfy the "assisted" part of your search.

Yes, I could type in six parts, but that's why I am trying to get around that. That leaves room for unrelated images.

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
tied_to_penis is not an existing tag.

Examples:
https://e621.net/post/show/750611/2014-animal_genitalia-animal_penis-anthro-anus-bal

https://e621.net/post/show/793804/anal-anal_penetration-anal_vore-animal_genitalia-a

https://e621.net/post/show/490100/2007-anthro-anus-bent_over-black_fur-black_penis-b

P.S. The title of the tag is more or less just an idea at the moment.

Yes, I could type in six parts, but that's why I am trying to get around that. That leaves room for unrelated images.

Something not existing doesn't mean you are not allowed to use it. Go ahead an use it.

Furrin_Gok said:
That wouldn't be assisted vore, it'd be assisted living insertion.

I concur.
Vore tag is already broad and its subtags poorly tagged. Which makes it hard to blacklist only certain types of vore without having to blacklist everything. For example: unbirthing, absorption, and oral vore are all rather different, but still lumped under the same tag.

Tagging insertions as vore would make that problem even worse.

Furrin_Gok said:
Something not existing doesn't mean you are not allowed to use it. Go ahead an use it.

I don't think it would be the easiest one person task. I do kindly ask for some help.

Also there is still the fact that we need to officialize a tag title.

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
I don't think it would be the easiest one person task. I do kindly ask for some help.

Also there is still the fact that we need to officialize a tag title.

We can alias the old title to the new one if necessary.

Furrin_Gok said:
We can alias the old title to the new one if necessary.

Doing that might have it include images that aren't exactly what the tag entails.

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
Doing that might have it include images that aren't exactly what the tag entails.

Well, it's a new tag to only tag that which would apply, anyways, right?

Furrin_Gok said:
Well, it's a new tag to only tag that which would apply, anyways, right?

Not exactly, because if you were to type in something like [vore micro unbirthing -duo], then you will get other things that aren't included in the purpose of the new tag. (Maybe I might be missing your point. Pardon if I am.)

(Sorry. I don't know how to hyperlink the tags.)

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
Not exactly, because if you were to type in something like [vore micro unbirthing -duo], then you will get other things that aren't included in the purpose of the new tag. (Maybe I might be missing your point. Pardon if I am.)

You wouldn't go tagging everything under that, would you? Just tag only what's relevant with the tied_to_penis tag.

Furrin_Gok said:
You wouldn't go tagging everything under that, would you? Just tag only what's relevant with the tied_to_penis tag.

As stated before, 'tied_to_penis' does not exist as a tag on this site.

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
As stated before, 'tied_to_penis' does not exist as a tag on this site.

And as long as it's relevant to the pictures, the admins have no problem with you adding it to them.

The only time you would be noted/reprimanded for adding a tag (even a new one) is would be for doing things that apply to things like:

• Tag does not apply to things depicted in the post in question.
• Tag does not make sense in a grammatical/language sense.
• Tag is not in english (exception for artists, species and characters).
• Tag contains unusual (e.g. non latin) characters (exception for artists, species and characters).
• Tag is ridiculously long with no comedic or otherwise useful value.
• Tag is personal, i.e. only useful to you.

That said it's always nice to discuss things first, we even have a thread about new tags: forum #181201. But might not be suitable for lengthy discussions and more for announcements.

Furrin_Gok said:
And as long as it's relevant to the pictures, the admins have no problem with you adding it to them.

I'd need some help putting the tag on many of the images. Plus, the title of the tag is still undecided.

Chessax said:
The only time you would be noted/reprimanded for adding a tag (even a new one) is would be for doing things that apply to things like:

• Tag does not apply to things depicted in the post in question.
• Tag does not make sense in a grammatical/language sense.
• Tag is not in english (exception for artists, species and characters).
• Tag contains unusual (e.g. non latin) characters (exception for artists, species and characters).
• Tag is ridiculously long with no comedic or otherwise useful value.
• Tag is personal, i.e. only useful to you.

That said it's always nice to discuss things first, we even have a thread about new tags: forum #181201. But might not be suitable for lengthy discussions and more for announcements.

:) Thanks for the info.

AllThisPornIsAmazing said:
I'd need some help putting the tag on many of the images. Plus, the title of the tag is still undecided.

You're dancing around in circles here.

• You can start up a new tag with no problem.
• The wording of the tag doesn't matter, as long as it's clear what it means.
• If an alternate tag is decided upon, the old one can easily be aliased to the new one.
• Nobody's going to get in trouble if the original tag doesn't perfectly match with the new one.

Talking about it amongst a group helps to find a reasonable tag, like the tied_to_* ones. Go ahead and tag those, as they're fairly straightforward and clear.

Furrin_Gok said:
You're dancing around in circles here.

• You can start up a new tag with no problem.
• The wording of the tag doesn't matter, as long as it's clear what it means.
• If an alternate tag is decided upon, the old one can easily be aliased to the new one.
• Nobody's going to get in trouble if the original tag doesn't perfectly match with the new one.

Talking about it amongst a group helps to find a reasonable tag, like the tied_to_* ones. Go ahead and tag those, as they're fairly straightforward and clear.

Okay. I'll still need a bit of help putting these tags into place.