Alias: cum_out_mouth -> cum_from_mouth
Alias: cum_out_of_mouth -> cum_from_mouth

Reason: Identical meanings for the same thing. Standardization.

cum_from_mouth specifically refers to cum being expelled through the mouth as a result of vomiting or anal sex until it goes all the way through. Could potentially refer to spitting up cum after oral sex with a particularly productive partner, but that also seems to be well served at the moment by cum_drool

cum_out_mouth is the better one, more in line with other cum_* location type tags.

cum_from_mouth 14
cum_from_nose 1
cum_out_mouth 3
cum_out_navel 6
cum_out_nose 16
cum_out_of_mouth 2
plus far more cum_in_* and cum_on_* tags than I care to count up.

I guess that "out" is more logically consistent with the cum_in_* standard but the grammar of it feels a little weird to my brain where as cum_from_* flows more linguistically. I suppose it wouldn't matter in the end though if an alias was created because then either search would be successful.

Yep, but when you use "in" and "on" then it sounds better to also use "out" as opposed to "from"

not sure how I feel about this..
cum_from_mouth and cum_out_mouth are both reasonable linguistically.

I think cum_from_mouth is a little more sound....

and the idea of cum being vomited or spewed outward is.. different then cum_drool, and i think that there should be different tags to serve the different scenarios of "I have given oral sex and cum is oozing out of my mouth" and "I have had so much cum inside me that it it is exploding out of my mouth."

I dunno

I personally like cum_from_mouth because it matches up better with cum_from_nose. Either way you word it, it definitely deserves it's own tag as it's a clearly defined situation.

Vote for cum_from_mouth.

cum_out_mouth feels more awkward than cum_from_mouth

okay, so...should we standardize 'from' over out?

as in:

cum_out_mouth is aliased to cum_from_mouth
cum_out_nose is aliased to cum_from_nose
cum_out_navel is aliased to cum_from_navel
cum_out_of_mouth is aliased to cum_from_mouth

Or just the ones related to mouth?

I'd say it's best to standardize it as one or the other, and make sure there's an alias so people searching for either can find it.

SnowWolf said:
okay, so...should we standardize 'from' over out?

as in:

cum_out_mouth is aliased to cum_from_mouth
cum_out_nose is aliased to cum_from_nose
cum_out_navel is aliased to cum_from_navel
cum_out_of_mouth is aliased to cum_from_mouth

Or just the ones related to mouth?

I agree with all of these proposed changes. I feel that standardizing them is the best way to go about it. I think that "from" is superior to "out".

SnowWolf said:
the idea of cum being vomited or spewed outward is.. different then cum_drool, and i think that there should be different tags to serve the different scenarios of "I have given oral sex and cum is oozing out of my mouth" and "I have had so much cum inside me that it it is exploding out of my mouth."

This is exactly my line on thought on why the two are different.

Considering the easily adjustable nature of these aliases, I have implemented:

• cum_out_mouth is aliased to cum_from_mouth
• cum_out_of_mouth is aliased to cum_from_mouth
• cum_out_nose is aliased to cum_from_nose
• cum_out_navel is aliased to cum_from_navel

also:

• cum_from_mouth implies cum
• cum_from_nose implies cum
• cum_from_navel implies cum

gonna tidy them up a little (there are one or from from_mouth images that look more like cum_drool) and add basic wiki pages. <3 If someone else could come along and flesh the wiki pages out with some more links and so forth, that would be awesome.

Seriously cum_drool should be folded in with all of that. cum_from_mouth and cum_drool are separated only by the way in which the cum "appears".

If the character has a mouth and there is cum in it that is not completely IN the mouth then it should just be labeled as cum_from_mouth.

Its akin to having drool and drool_from mouth, wherein drool_from_mouth is when the drool is actively being forced from the character's mouth.

I mean its vague and leaves too much to interpretation.

Vixxxine69 said:
Seriously cum_drool should be folded in with all of that. cum_from_mouth and cum_drool are separated only by the way in which the cum "appears".

I thought about cum_from_mouth implicating cum drool, but iamges like post #165155 and post #186392 are clearly not 'drooling'.... the difference is in how the way the cum appears, but that difference is worth tagging. Just like the difference between cum_drool and cum_in_mouth is how it appears, or the difference between cum_on_face and cum_on_breasts is where it appears... and is worth tagging.

If the character has a mouth and there is cum in it that is not completely IN the mouth then it should just be labeled as cum_from_mouth.

Its akin to having drool and drool_from mouth, wherein drool_from_mouth is when the drool is actively being forced from the character's mouth.

I mean its vague and leaves too much to interpretation.

Honestly, I disagree. there are differences. I'll admit that cum_from_mouth is actually a tag of vague interest to me... and most cum_drool images are not. there is a difference... I think the biggest issue is that cum droop and cum from mouth are both under utilized as tags.