Whenever I come across a piece in which a male's penis is protruding through the fly of his underwear, I regret that I don't know a way to tag it. Does a tag exist? If not, do you think it's worth making one? "Through fly" seems like it would make sense.

maybe penis_out? kind of like tongue_out

Like this?
post #280686
post #197889
post #86803
https://inkbunny.net/submissionview.php?id=46121
My best bet would to use the unzipped tag.

Not quite. In those posts, the penis is protruding over unzipped pants. I was thinking of posts in which the penis is threaded through underwear (which doesn't typically have zippers), like these:

post #308867
post #299367
post #159288

I think penis_out sounds good here, seeing as zippers aren't in all the images. If we do start using this tag though, somebody should write about it on the wiki. "penis out" would sound a little confusing at first.

720p said:
I think penis_out sounds good here, seeing as zippers aren't in all the images. If we do start using this tag though, somebody should write about it on the wiki. "penis out" would sound a little confusing at first.

Do we need admin permission?

TheHuskyK9 said:
Do we need admin permission?

You don't need permission to start using a new tag on the site. As long as it's not a trolly tag and fits our usual tag criteria it should be fine. It is a good idea to announce the new tag in the forum or something so that people are aware it exists and can start adding it themselves.

In this case though, I suggest penis_through_fly, since it's clearer than just penis_out.

When I saw the title of the thread, I honestly had no idea what to expect. I just couldn't sort out what a penis through fly would be.

But yes, I think penis_out would be good, though I think we should lump the two things together here. That is, have penis_out apply to images where it is through the fly, but the pants/underwear remain on and buttoned (if applicable), as well as images where it is pulled out above the waistband or the pants are entirely undone but pretty much still entirely on.

RedOctober said:
But yes, I think penis_out would be good, though I think we should lump the two things together here. That is, have penis_out apply to images where it is through the fly, but the pants/underwear remain on and buttoned (if applicable), as well as images where it is pulled out above the waistband or the pants are entirely undone but pretty much still entirely on.

Personally, I would like to be able to search specifically for images with the penis through the fly, as I find that idea particularly appealing for some reason. While I could sift through images with the penis above the waistband to find them, that would be cumbersome because the former seems to be significantly rarer than the latter.

Perhaps penis_out could refer to both situations, as you suggest, while penis_through_fly would also be used for just the one. That way, it would be possible to search for either separately or for both together.

RedOctober said:
When I saw the title of the thread, I honestly had no idea what to expect. I just couldn't sort out what a penis through fly would be.

Insectophilia?

"Oh, yes! So wonderful! I love [censored]ing bugs!"
"bzzz... help me... help me...."

Ontopic, Confused's suggestion seems reasonable.

Isn't poking_out generally used to field this?

Pseudonym said:
Isn't poking_out generally used to field this?

According to the wiki, poking_out applies when a penis is "poking through clothing intended to cover it" [my emphasis], whereas the purpose of an underwear fly is to expose the penis. It also seems like that tag would be more appropriate for images in which the penis is only partially visible, while the situations considered here have no such restriction.

Besides, it can't make the distinction I discussed in my previous post-at least not alone.