Implicating princess_tiana → the_princess_and_the_frog
Link to implication

Reason:

character -> copyright

Also:
louis_(the_princess_and_the_frog) -> the_princess_and_the_frog
prince_naveen -> the_princess_and_the_frog
the_princess_and_the_frog -> disney

grace_(home_on_the_range) -> home_on_the_range
maggie_(home_on_the_range) -> home_on_the_range
mrs_calloway -> home_on_the_range
home_on_the_range -> disney

david_kawena -> lilo_and_stitch
lilo_pelekai -> lilo_and_stitch
nani_pelekai -> lilo_and_stitch
gantu -> lilo_and_stitch

Alias lilo -> lilo_pelekai (latter is full name)

EDIT: The tag implication princess_tiana -> the_princess_and_the_frog (forum #212824) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

"The Princess And The Frog" is a public domain fairy tale. Implications of Disney characters belonging to the 2009 adaptation should use the_princess_and_the_frog_(2009) instead.

gattonero2001 said:
"The Princess And The Frog" is a public domain fairy tale. Implications of Disney characters belonging to the 2009 adaptation should use the_princess_and_the_frog_(2009) instead.

The public domain fairy tale is actually named The Frog Prince so I think this one could actually work out

faucet said:
The public domain fairy tale is actually named The Frog Prince so I think this one could actually work out

Oops, I was translating the name in my head. However, the year suffix disambiguation wouldn't hurt and it is an useful standard for adaptations of earlier works in general.

The tag implication princess_tiana -> the_princess_and_the_frog (forum #212824) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.