Implicating mittens → gloves
Link to implication
Reason:
A mitten is a type of glove.
EDIT: The tag implication mittens -> gloves (forum #217146) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
Updated by auto moderator
Topic: Tag Implication: mittens -> gloves
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
-1. I know them as kind of antonyms. A mitten has no fingers, a glove does.
Updated by anonymous
-1 from me too, for the same reason as Furrin.
Updated by anonymous
+1. I see mittens as gloves without separate spaces for each finger.
Furrin_Gok said:
-1. I know them as kind of antonyms. A mitten has no fingers, a glove does.
A sock usually don't have separate spaces for each toe, but "toe_socks" imply "socks". have an unusual characteristic isn't the same that be an antonym (not even close). Besides, "mittens" wiki describe mitten as a type of glove.
Updated by anonymous
O16 said:
Besides, "mittens" wiki describe mitten as a type of glove.
Actually, I was the one who typed that entry up. I have citations, though.
Wikipedia says:
Gloves which cover the entire hand or fist but do not have separate finger openings or sheaths are called mittens.
Google and Oxford Dictionaries say:
A glove with two sections, one for the thumb and the other for all four fingers.
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication mittens -> gloves (forum #217146) has been rejected by @furrypickle.