Updated by skunk in scarf
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Updated by skunk in scarf
O16 said:
Implicating red_squirrel → squirrel
Link to implicationReason:
It is a species of squirrel.
+1
Updated by anonymous
O16 said:
Implicating red_squirrel → squirrel
Link to implicationReason:
It is a species of squirrel.
It'd probably be a good idea to implicate the more often used squirrel tags that aren't already implicated too
Updated by anonymous
-1 to the red_squirrel implication
In regards to species and sub-species tag names defined by fur/skin/feather color and why they should all be aliased away to the primary species or alternative sub-species name. forum #202130
Updated by anonymous
Ruku said:
-1 to the red_squirrel implicationIn regards to species and sub-species tag names defined by fur/skin/feather color and why they should all be aliased away to the primary species or alternative sub-species name. forum #202130
This seems to be a completely different case.
The attempt of aliasing was based on the fact that "there are variants of foxes that have black coats in reality", not in an actual species.
The whole idea of aliasing away entire species because there are colors within their names is extremely harsh, and sincerely sounds unnecessary.
Note: red squirrels have fur tufts on their ears differentiating then from other squirrels; actually, even monochrome posts have been tagged with 'red_squirrel'.
Updated by anonymous
Ruku said:
-1 to the red_squirrel implicationIn regards to species and sub-species tag names defined by fur/skin/feather color and why they should all be aliased away to the primary species or alternative sub-species name. forum #202130
-1 to this idea. There's black panthers, blue-eyed black lemurs, red foxes, and plenty of other species with colors in their names.
Updated by anonymous
Approved
Updated by anonymous