Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating fire_hose → hose
Link to implication
A fire hose is a type of hose.
EDIT: The tag implication fire_hose -> hose (forum #218878) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
Updated by auto moderator
i dont think that separating all the hoses is necessary. maybe just alias them all to hose
Updated by anonymous
Not all of them, just those two because they have tags and can be recognized on sight.
Updated by anonymous
Mutisija said:
i dont think that separating all the hoses is necessary. maybe just alias them all to hose
While it doesn't sound like something users would search for random images by, it does sound like something they would remember when trying to find an old image, and would search for it there.
Updated by anonymous
Bump. I say this is a valid implication. +1
The tag implication fire_hose -> hose (forum #218878) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
