Implicating fire_hair → fire
Link to implication

Reason:

Maybe implicate to hair as well?

Alias it to flaming_hair. Fire_hair is currently tagged more, but flaming_hair is already listed on two dozen wiki pages.

sdrawkcaB said:
Maybe implicate to hair as well?

I would say no. Most instances it's basically just fire on the head, not hair.

Genjar said:
Alias it to flaming_hair. Fire_hair is currently tagged more, but flaming_hair is already listed on two dozen wiki pages.

+1

Furrin_Gok said:
I would say no. Most instances it's basically just fire on the head, not hair.

Oh, good point.

Genjar said:
Alias it to flaming_hair. Fire_hair is currently tagged more, but flaming_hair is already listed on two dozen wiki pages.

This is good enough reason for me :V

Approved alias -> flaming_hair
Approved implication -> fire
Denied implication -> hair

parasprite said:
This is good enough reason for me :V

Approved alias -> flaming_hair
Approved implication -> fire
Denied implication -> hair

...YOu got those implications backwards, Parasprite. You approved hair, not fire.

And it took 10 months to notice.